AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Tony Biehl

CISCIS · CIS1 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a , but expect some pace challenges if you are new to computers.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear lecture notesFunny teacherHelpful in classAdvanced pace
  • Students praise his lecture notes and teaching style.
  • One review says the class may be advanced for students with weak computer skills.
  • He gives individual help during class and keeps the class on schedule.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Difficulty looks low overall, but there is no direct grade evidence or easy-A claim.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The class seems manageable with strong notes, but the pace can feel advanced for students lacking computer basics.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person CIS reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

, and helpful in-class support.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reviews show low difficulty but .

Format shift

, and none directly describe grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

No one complains about heavy work, but the comments do not prove a very light workload.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention the class experience, with no online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students praise his notes, humor, and individual help, with one concern about advanced pacing.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

In-person comments do not give enough assessment detail, and there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe him as funny, helpful, and strong with lecture notes.

Main concern

His teaching style may be advanced for computer-illiterate students.

What students said

“Lecture notes are amazing.”
CIS1
“He's hilarious and a great teacher!”
CISCIS
“his teaching style might be a bit advanced for some computer illiterate students”
CISCIS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Tony Biehl was my first Community College teacher, I have to say I was impressed by his skills”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting teaching quality and support themes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Lecture notes are amazing.”

👍 Student Recommendation

80/100

“He's hilarious and a great teacher!”

🧭 Learning Support

66/100

“he always made sure to have enough time to give each their own 1-on-1 help during class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lecture notes are amazing.
  • He's hilarious and a great teacher!
  • his teaching style might be a bit advanced for some computer illiterate students

Theme 2

🤝 About Helpfulness

  • he always made sure to have enough time to give each their own 1-on-1 help during class
  • and yet still have every one able to leave on time at the end of class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only , though their teaching comments are fairly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CISCIS2 reviews
CIS11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values