AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Hany Talya

INTRO5497 · ID17 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from the textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor teachingUnhelpfulUnclear gradingSelf-study required
  • Students consistently say they learned little and felt lost.
  • as unclear and based on personal preference.
  • Students had to rely on the textbook instead of instructor support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting a good grade sounds difficult because students report , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course felt hard because students said they were lost and had to learn the material from the book.

All course and introductory course reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students directly discourage taking him because they felt he was unhelpful, irresponsible, and ineffective.

The recommendation and is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students describe grading as , and not based on the work submitted.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload itself is not clearly described, but students and self-teaching.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they focus more on poor support than workload volume.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students repeatedly say he taught poorly, did not help, and .

Format shift

All and is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention assignments and but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assignments, with no online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, with repeated complaints about poor teaching, lack of help, and .

Main concern

while .

What students said

“he was the .”
INTRO5497
“If you want to learn anything, you must read the textbook.”
ID17
“i was so lost in this class.”
ID17

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn anything, you must read the textbook.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“i was so lost in this class.”

⚖️

15/100

“ job.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he was the .
  • i was so lost in this class.
  • it would seem that he didin't want to help you.

Theme 2

📚

  • If you want to learn anything, you must read the textbook.
  • so you really need to study the book to get this class.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • job.
  • , so you don't know where you stand until the end of the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only three older reviews, but they are detailed and highly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ID172 reviews
INTRO54971 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values