AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Judith Podskalan

CIS1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you already know the material and do not need hands-on teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy WorkSelf-Study HeavyLow Instructor PresenceNot Hands-On
  • The work itself is easy, especially for students who already know Microsoft Office tools.
  • Teaching support is weak, with one review saying students should work and study on their own.
  • The tiny review sample is split, so the score is cautious but comments lean negative on instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The course seems easy to pass if you already have Word and PowerPoint experience, but .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

The content appears easy and basic for students with prior Microsoft Office experience.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because the main detailed review says she is not hands-on and leaves students to teach themselves.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Comments say the work is easy, but there is .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews .

Workload

Light

84/100

The workload is described as easy and a breeze for students with relevant prior experience.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching quality is weak because the detailed review says she mainly supervises while students work on their own.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention work in software skills but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but instruction may be minimal.

Main concern

Students who need active guidance may feel unsupported.

What students said

“Super Easy”
CIS1
“be prepared to work and study on your own here.”
CIS1
“ if you want a teacher who is more hands on.”
CIS1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, book policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want a teacher who is more hands on.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching support and course ease. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She is sorta just acts as a security guard, she is just there.”

📈 Course Ease

85/100

“Super Easy”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“ if you want a teacher who is more hands on.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • be prepared to work and study on your own here.
  • She is sorta just acts as a security guard, she is just there.
  • if you want a teacher who is more hands on.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Work

  • Super Easy
  • The work is easy and a breeze if you . experience.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and one is extremely brief.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIS12 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values