AI Rate Professor

English

Steven Elmore

ENG1 · ENG101 · ENGLISH1A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

, but if you mainly want an easy grade.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMethodical TeacherVery HelpfulHard GraderLong AssignmentsStrong Learning Value
  • Students describe him as a strong, caring English teacher who helps students learn.
  • The course is not an easy A because he grades hard and expects detailed work.
  • Students who want real improvement may benefit more than students seeking a light English class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A requires significant effort because students report , and high expectations.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

, but the class still demands detailed work and sustained effort.

Only in-person reviews describe course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention long class sessions but do .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it does not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Students recommend him for learning and support, but the seekers.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

One review directly says he grades very hard and expects a lot, with no evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report many long hours on assignments and long class sessions.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students describe him as methodical, caring, knowledgeable, helpful, and effective at making English easier to understand.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize assignments and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews praise his teaching and support, but and .

Main concern

The main concern is the heavy effort required for assignments and .

What students said

“Steve always found a way to make it easy, on an intellectual level.”
ENG101
“He expects a lot out of you, grades very hard”
ENGLISH1A
“expect many .”
ENGLISH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and grading but do not clearly describe exams.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He expects a lot out of you, grades very hard, very detailed, you will learn a few things from him”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and learning value. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is the .”

📈 Grade Effort

38/100

“if u want a easy english class this is not the one.”

📝 Workload

30/100

“expect many .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Steve always found a way to make it easy, on an intellectual level.
  • Great teacher, he really cares and is always there to help you.
  • He seems to really want his students to learn and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He expects a lot out of you, grades very hard
  • if u want a easy english class this is not the one.
  • expect many .

Theme 3

❤️ About Learning Value

  • you will learn a few things from him
  • My daugher is now getting A's in all of her english courses because of him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because the 4 reviews are consistent about teaching quality but sparse and old.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENG11 review
ENG1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values