AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Chris Hovick

COLLEGE25 · MATH410 · MATH25 · MATH420 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you are highly independent and comfortable with a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedVery HardPoor ExplanationsHeavy HomeworkSlow Test Returns
  • Most reviews describe , poor organization, and .
  • Students consistently report high difficulty, heavy work, and .
  • One student found him brilliant, but the overall advice is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very hard because students , and poor feedback.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The math content feels harder because , and difficult to follow.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe the course as hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe an , though one review says he sometimes arrived late or missed class.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students advise against taking him because of disorganization, poor teaching, and high difficulty.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Reviews do not give grade outcomes, but the high difficulty and and stressful grading experience.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students and a very hard class.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Most comments describe unclear lectures, poor organization, missed class time, and rude behavior.

Format shift

In-person reviews dominate the evidence and are strongly negative, with one positive exception.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework and tests, but they do .

Format shift

and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

about disorganization, unclear teaching, heavy work, and rude behavior.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves because explanations and organization are weak.

What students said

“he doesn't teach at all during class”
MATH25
“ , and hands out too much work.”
MATH25
“ .”
COLLEGE25

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests being returned late, but they do not .

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam format or rules.

Tests MentionedDelayed Test Returns
“Also takes .”
MATH25
“He doesn't return test in .”
MATH25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ IF YOU WANT TO LEARN!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Whatever he does is just writing stuff from the book and copying it on the blackboard.”

⚠️ Difficulty

15/100

“Very hard class.”

👎 Recommendation

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he doesn't teach at all during class
  • Mr. .
  • He is very because of his lecture and explaination styles.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Tests

  • , and hands out too much work.
  • Also takes .
  • He doesn't return test in .

Theme 3

⚖️ Mixed Opinions

  • Dr. Hovick is certainly NOT for every student, but I'm glad I took him.
  • Good teacher. eccentric, anger problems

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews over several years are consistent and detailed, but they are old and lack grade data.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH254 reviews
COLLEGE251 review
MATH4101 review
MATH4201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values