AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Barbara Hindman

ADN41 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid if possible, because the and unsupportive in-person experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerProgram Leadership ConcernsHarsh TestingNot Student SupportiveVery Difficult
  • Both reviews describe severe dissatisfaction with program leadership and student support.
  • Students report early semesters.
  • There is no positive evidence about teaching quality, grading, attendance flexibility, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears extremely hard because students describe NCLEX-level testing and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

The course appears intellectually and structurally punishing because tests are described as too advanced for early nursing students.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly discourage the experience because they describe poor leadership and little student protection.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Testing is described as unfairly hard and beyond the expected level for early students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

The workload itself is not detailed, but as overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students describe poor support, bad program management, and no meaningful help for students.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

The only concrete assessment evidence centers on difficult NCLEX-style tests.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and focus on poor support and harsh program testing.

Main concern

Students felt unsupported and .

What students said

“some of the tripping teachers or to tests that are given that are all questions from the NCLEX study books”
ADN41
“is not there to help the students from being railroaded”
ADN41

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe tests as very difficult and built from NCLEX study-book questions, but .

NCLEX-Style QuestionsVery Difficult Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

10/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe very difficult NCLEX-style tests without clear evidence on book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

NCLEX-Style QuestionsVery Difficult Tests
“ from the NCLEX study books”
ADN41

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Needs to either step down and hire someone from the outside for her position or change the way the program is run.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“is not there to help the students from being railroaded”

⚠️

10/100

“Why would you allow questions like that for 1st and 2nd semester students when many RN's have trouble answering them?????”

👎 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“Chaffeys program is horrible”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support

  • is not there to help the students from being railroaded
  • No mind of her own.

Theme 2

📝 About Tests

  • from the NCLEX study books
  • Why would you allow questions like that for 1st and 2nd semester students when many RN's have trouble answering them?????

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but their negative tone is consistent and specific about testing and support.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ADN412 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values