AI Rate Professor

Nursing

C Dupee

ADN20 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor InstructionAccusatoryHigh DifficultyNegative Classroom Climate
  • The only review describes almost no useful instruction.
  • The student reports wrongful accusations and a hostile tone.
  • Evidence is very limited because there .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

There is no grade evidence, and the harsh tone plus maximum difficulty suggest getting an A would require major effort.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The course experience appears difficult because students may receive little instruction and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The student strongly criticizes the instructor's attitude, fairness, and teaching effort.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

The , but it reports unfair accusations and maximum difficulty.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is not clearly described, but the reported lack of instruction likely makes the course feel heavy.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

The review says the instructor does little instructing and creates a negative student experience.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and unfair accusations.

Main concern

The main concern is a hostile and accusatory classroom experience.

What students said

“Does not do much instructing.”
ADN20
“Wrongfully accuses students”
ADN20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Does not do much instructing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and fairness; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Does not do much instructing.”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

10/100

“Wrongfully accuses students”

📉 Recommendation Risk

10/100

“This instructor does not seem to like her job.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not do much instructing.
  • This instructor does not seem to like her job.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Fairness

  • Wrongfully accuses students
  • Looks for bad things about students that aren't even there.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review with limited course detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ADN201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values