AI Rate Professor

English

Diana Ramseyer

ENG450 · ENGL450 · ENGLIE1A · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you are independent, resilient, and comfortable with heavy writing and direct criticism.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRude toneNot helpfulHeavy essaysUnclear gradingDirect but divisive
  • Most students describe her as rude, unhelpful, or impersonal, though a few find her direct and helpful.
  • The class demands major writing work, drafts, revisions, tutoring, and textbook use.
  • Students and lack of feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears difficult because essays require outlines, drafts, revisions, tutoring, and as unclear.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels challenging because students report heavy writing demands, strict expectations, and limited guidance.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One supportive review explicitly says to attend class and follow the syllabus, while .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because they felt .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

as unclear, random, and poorly explained, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews mention five-page essays, outlines, drafts, revisions, tutoring, daily textbook use, and high stress.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most reviews describe her as comments about directness and support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment evidence centers on essays, drafts, revisions, tutoring, and textbook work rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are sharply divided but mostly negative, emphasizing , and limited help.

Main concern

Students often feel unsupported and .

What students said

“This teacher was rude and .”
ENGLIE1A
“She doesn't grade based on a .”
ENG450
“Attend class, follow the syllbi and you will pass.”
ENGL450

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and class work, so the , and .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book, midterm, final, or quiz policies.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher was rude and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Rude and not helpful. Unorganized and VERY unfriendly.”

⚖️

20/100

“She doesn't grade based on a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“She would expect 5 full page essays, outlines, drafts, and have you revise them and also see a tutor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher was rude and .
  • Rude and not helpful. Unorganized and VERY unfriendly.
  • Love Dr. and to the point

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She doesn't grade based on a .
  • It seems like she just picks a random number.
  • Attend class, follow the syllbi and you will pass.

Theme 3

📝 About Writing Work

  • She would expect 5 full page essays, outlines, drafts, and have you revise them and also see a tutor.
  • textbook was used everyday

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed in-person reviews show a consistent negative pattern with a .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG4505 reviews
ENGL4503 reviews
ENGLIE1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values