AI Rate Professor

Hotel & Restaurant Management

Siavash Haghighi

HOTFS18 · HOTFS · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want an engaging instructor and are willing to keep up with science-heavy material.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny lecturerWell planned lecturesScience-heavy contentHelpful notesMixed difficulty
  • Students generally describe him as funny and enjoyable in class.
  • Lectures are well thought out and can provide useful information.
  • Difficulty depends heavily on comfort with the science content, with one student calling it the hardest class taken.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The course can be manageable with good notes, but science difficulty prevents it from being a .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

and enjoyable, but the science content can feel difficult for some students.

, and they conflict on difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

In-person comments mention lectures and notes but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and organized, though the course may be hard for students who dislike science.

Recommendation and is positive but limited.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

, so grading appears fair rather than clearly lenient or harsh.

Format shift

, and none clearly describe grading policy.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Students need to write and retain notes, and some if they do not keep up.

Format shift

In-person workload evidence is limited but suggests steady note-based study.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students describe him as , and informative, though one older review is less enthusiastic.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews discuss lectures and notes but do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment details are sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and lectures, but difficulty varies by student background.

Main concern

Students weak in science may find the class much harder than the ratings suggest.

What students said

“His lectures are well thought out and .”
HOTFS18
“he is such a funny guy! i enjoyed his class.”
HOTFS18
“Hardest class I've taken, science is not my forte”
HOTFS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or format.

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His lectures are well thought out and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“His lectures are well thought out and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“he is such a funny guy! i enjoyed his class.”

📚 Course Difficulty

55/100

“Hardest class I've taken, science is not my forte”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are well thought out and .
  • his accent is cool and he is a funny guy.
  • he is such a funny guy! i enjoyed his class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Study

  • write them down and you will retain the info better
  • I because of this
  • Hardest class I've taken, science is not my forte

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 old reviews are available, and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HOTFS182 reviews
HOTFS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values