AI Rate Professor

English

Ingrid Schreck

ENGL450 · ENG1A · 1AINET · ENGL1AINET · ENG450 · ENGLISH1A · ENG1AONLINE · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a helpful English instructor and can handle a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful instructorTime-consuming workCreative assignmentsMixed clarityFair grading
  • Students often find Schreck helpful, fair, and capable of making English interesting.
  • The workload is the main risk, with repeated comments about lots of reading, writing, participation, and web portfolio work.
  • Some students loved the class and found it easy, while others disliked the busy work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is realistic with steady work and , but several students say the and not effortless.

All evidence is classified as in person by the supplied counts, even when comment text mentions online classes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The English content is manageable and often engaging, but reading, writing, web work, and course.

All course easiness because online review count is zero.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews mention logging on and completing weekly participation, but do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person-classified reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, and engaging material, but workload and clarity concerns keep it from being a must-take for everyone.

All recommendation evidence is from reviews classified as in person by the authoritative counts.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Students mention fair grading, , and an A+ outcome, but the grade still requires sustained work.

Format shift

as in person.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Multiple reviews describe lots of , and web portfolio work.

Format shift

All workload evidence is classified as in person despite several comments describing online coursework.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students call her helpful, fair, creative, and engaging, though a minority criticize clarity and tone.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and portfolios rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Authoritative counts classify all reviews as in person, and the comments show a helpful but sometimes workload-heavy English course experience.

Main concern

The main concern is heavy online-style coursework, web portfolio work, and occasional .

What students said

“A lot of work, but all valid.”
ENG1AONLINE
“Prof. and fair when it came to my grade.”
ENGLISH1A
“She gives ALOT of BS busy work.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest exam-related evidence says students create a web portfolio instead of a course.

No Traditional Final MentionedWeb Portfolio Instead of FinalAssignment-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-classified comments mention a web portfolio instead of a final, but do .

Web Portfolio Instead of FinalAssignment-Based Assessment
“Instead of a class work”
ENG1AONLINE
“alot of you "”
ENGL1AINET
“IN addition to 3 papers you have a lot of .”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A lot of work, but all valid.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person-classified reviews, highlighting helpful teaching, heavy workload, and ; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and will kindly answer any question students ask.”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“Be prepared to spend many hours on-line if .”

👍 Recommendation Balance

76/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Teacher. I actually learned something and it was not boring.
  • but you have to remember to ask!
  • she's helpful and she really knows what she's doing.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • This class is VERY time consuming.
  • A lot of work, but all valid.
  • be prepared for a lot of reading and writting.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Structure

  • gives a LOT of !!
  • Prof. and fair when it came to my grade.
  • Instead of a class work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 11 reviews are fairly detailed but older and internally mixed, with format text conflicting with authoritative counts.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGLISH1A3 reviews
ENG1AONLINE2 reviews
ENGL1AINET2 reviews
1AINET1 review
ENG1A1 review
Show 2 more courses
ENG4501 review
ENGL4501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values