AI Rate Professor

Accounting

L Colunga

ACCTG480 · ACCTG1A · BUS49 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take L Colunga only if you can rely on the , and learn independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBook ReliantExtra CreditMandatory AttendancePoor ExplanationsPassable Class
  • Reviews are sharply split, with one student finding the class passable and others criticizing her teaching.
  • Students say accounting is manageable through the , and rather than strong instruction.
  • The biggest risk is needing .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A , and , but not because the teaching makes it effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Accounting itself is described as hard, though the class can be passable with homework and the textbook.

Only in-person reviews exist, and but conceptually demanding accounting content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

One review explicitly says students have to attend every class meeting.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Recommendation is low because multiple students say she does not teach or .

but leans negative, and there is no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

and clear syllabus-based expectations make grades attainable for students who complete the work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students must attend, complete homework, and keep up with accounting material, but the workload is not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person comments mention workload and .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Two of three reviews and expects the book to teach the material.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person and strongly mixed, with one positive review outweighed by specific negative complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize syllabus compliance, homework, attendance, and .

Format shift

and but do not clearly describe exam weight.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, but the and dependence on the book.

Main concern

because comments .

What students said

“ and expects the book to teach you.”
BUS49
“Instructor doesn't teach anything, but the book is the BEST!!”
ACCTG480
“If you follow the syllabus, and complete the class.”
ACCTG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, exam .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, exam difficulty, open-book rules, proctoring, midterms, or finals.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and expects the book to teach you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Instructor doesn't teach anything, but the book is the BEST!!”

📈 Grade Path

68/100

“If you follow the syllabus, and complete the class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ ! EVER!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and expects the book to teach you.
  • Instructor doesn't teach anything, but the book is the BEST!!
  • Lorraine is an accounting professor and as to what she expects.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is a very passable class.
  • You have to attent every class meeting and +.
  • She gaves lots of !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and opinions conflict strongly despite shared concerns about textbook reliance.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCTG1A1 review
ACCTG4801 review
BUS491 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values