AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Harold Ludwig

CHEM10LAB · CHEM10 · CHEM10L · CHEMLAB · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can handle slow, quiet lectures and are willing to ask directly for help.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyQuiet LecturerLong Lab LecturesHelpful When AskedUneven Experience
  • Students describe him as kind and willing to help, but often too quiet or slow to follow.
  • Long lectures often leave too little time for lab work.
  • Older reviews are sharply split between very positive help-focused experiences and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A seems possible with attendance and weekly work, but .

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The as easy, but unclear and lengthy lectures make the course harder to manage.

, and they conflict between easy weekly work and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance appears important because students say the work is easy if you go to class, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Students appreciate his kindness, but repeated complaints about inaudible lectures and .

Only in-person evidence exists, with more recent comments being more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

There is , though one A+ and easy-work comments suggest grading is not especially harsh.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Weekly work is described as easy, but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

He is caring and helpful one-on-one, but many students say his lectures are quiet, slow, and ineffective for lab time.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and the negative lecture delivery pattern is repeated.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus on weekly lab work and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and help, but repeatedly criticize quiet delivery and long lectures that .

Main concern

Students may struggle to hear him and .

What students said

“His lectures will take up most of class period and you will have to haul *** just .”
CHEM10
“ if you need it.”
CHEM10LAB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“very nice professor, but very slow and quiet in speaking.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and helpfulness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“he lectures really long so you end up not having enough time to finish the labs.”

🤝 Helpfulness

70/100

“ if you need it.”

⚖️ Workload Fit

52/100

“the work is due every week and is really easy if you go to class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he needs a microphone so you can hear him.
  • He goes into to his own little world when he lectures.
  • this teacher would be an awesome lecturer because he stays on track and does not get sidetracked that easy.

Theme 2

🧪

  • His lectures will take up most of class period and you will have to haul *** just .
  • he lectures so long their is little time left to perform the lab.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • he truely if you ask him for extra help
  • What a great guy! Good sense of humor.
  • I LOVE this man! He is funny, but very smart.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven older reviews provide consistent patterns about lecture delivery, but limited grade and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM10LAB3 reviews
CHEMLAB2 reviews
CHEM101 review
CHEM10L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values