AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Patricia Cassaro

PHIL81 · PHILO4882 · PHLIL81 · PHIL101 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Consider her if you enjoy opinionated philosophy discussion, but if and tightly focused lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate PhilosopherPolarizing ClassroomReligion-Heavy DiscussionsQuestionable Grade Consistency
  • Students are split between finding her passionate and insightful and finding the class boring or frustrating.
  • Several comments mention religion-focused discussion that may not match expectations for philosophy courses.
  • One review raises a serious concern about a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Getting an A is not clearly easy because students mention foreign terms, expected outside knowledge, and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course content can feel difficult because of foreign terms, broad expectations, and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently suggest at least moderate intellectual challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

, but skipping early appears to create classroom conflict.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether students value her passion or are frustrated by tone, focus, and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and student reactions are strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

One student claims an earned B became a C, and other comments suggest demanding expectations beyond the text.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is not described as excessive, but the material and terminology require effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss difficulty.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is praised as passionate and insightful, but criticized as rude, boring, and unfocused by other students.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews are available, with sharply mixed teaching impressions.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

In-person comments do not give enough assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but polarizing professor whose class can feel insightful, difficult, religiously framed, or unfair depending on the student.

Main concern

The main risk is unfocused or religion-heavy discussion with inconsistent student trust in grading.

What students said

“Expects you to know things that were never even in the text.”
PHIL101
“Very insightful! She exudes passion for philosophy and life, not just a great teacher but a good person as well.”
PHIL81

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very insightful! She exudes passion for philosophy and life, not just a great teacher but a good person as well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching style, difficulty, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Very insightful! She exudes passion for philosophy and life, not just a great teacher but a good person as well.”

⚖️

32/100

“When I checked Chaffeyview, apparently she changed her mind and gave me a C.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrible! Mean and rude!
  • Very insightful! She exudes passion for philosophy and life, not just a great teacher but a good person as well.
  • Philosophy can be such an amazing experience when presented the right way.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty

  • Don't get discouraged with the amount of foreign terms used.
  • Expects you to know things that were never even in the text.

Theme 3

⚖️ And Focus

  • When I checked Chaffeyview, apparently she changed her mind and gave me a C.
  • we just bible thumped for the semester.
  • She didn't bible thump per se, just compared the religions to Christianity.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five , but exam and grading details are limited.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL812 reviews
PHIL1011 review
PHILO48821 review
PHLIL811 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values