AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Dennis Inouye

DRAFTING20 · DRAFT20 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you already have drafting experience and can learn independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught requiredFast paceLimited helpHard testsBetter for experienced students
  • Students say he is laid back but often does not teach enough.
  • Beginners may struggle because he assumes prior AutoCAD or drafting knowledge.
  • Tests are described as hard, though .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears to require strong prior skills and self-study because tests are hard and help is limited.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels challenging because he moves fast and assumes students already know drafting tools.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and none clearly discuss attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

experience, not beginners.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and limited help suggest grading is not especially forgiving.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention tests or .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload feels heavy because students report needing to learn a lot on their own.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching is inconsistent, with one helpful review but multiple comments saying he teaches too little or too fast.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Comments focus mainly on three tests and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but hands-off instructor with and limited beginner support.

Main concern

He may move too fast and expect students to teach themselves.

What students said

“you have to learn a lot by yourselves.”
DRAFT20
“ .”
DRAFT20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and some pre-test review, but they do not clearly prove book, proctoring, webcam, or software policies.

Hard TestsTest ReviewsThree Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and helpful review before three tests, but no clear book or .

Hard TestsTest ReviewsThree Tests
“ .”
DRAFT20
“Extremely helpful in reviewing just prior to the (3) tests throughout this course.”
DRAFTING20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“you have to learn a lot by yourselves.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and student fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“does not teach that much, assumes that we already know how to do stuff”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

35/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Fit

35/100

“i don't recommend him for beginners, but before.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • a laid back teacher, does not teach that much
  • he does it so fast that you wont be able to know where he is at.

Theme 2

📈

  • .
  • Extremely helpful in reviewing just prior to the (3) tests throughout this course.

Theme 3

🧭 About Student Fit

  • you have to learn a lot by yourselves.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews give some consistent themes, but details are limited and one review is not substantive.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DRAFT203 reviews
DRAFTING201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values