AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Martin Martin

SOC2517 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle heavy work, vague criteria, and limited help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy HomeworkTough GraderLow GuidancePolitics In ClassNightmare Class
  • Both reviews describe a difficult class with poor support.
  • and unnecessary politics.
  • In person evidence emphasizes poor guidance for midterms, finals, and missed extra sessions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Grades are possible, but comments , and little guidance.

, while In person evidence stresses tough grading and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The class feels difficult because tasks lack criteria and .

Both formats show difficulty, with Online tied to workload and In .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

, but missing them can leave students unsupported.

review; Online evidence does not mention attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students describe the class as stressful, poorly supported, and .

Both Online and In person reviews are negative, though they emphasize different problems.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

and both reviews report difficult course conditions.

Format shift

The In person review directly supports strict grading, while the Online review supports a .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

The , and the In person review describes the class as a nightmare.

Format shift

Online evidence is clearly heavy workload, while In person evidence is more about guidance and .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students report , and unnecessary political content despite somewhat engaging lectures.

Format shift

Online teaching concerns focus on professionalism, while In person concerns focus on lack of guidance.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and midterm and .

Format shift

Online evidence focuses on assignments, while In and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The In person review says lectures are somewhat engaging but the class lacks criteria, guidance, and .

Main concern

Students may struggle because guidance for tasks, midterms, and .

What students said

“no guidance when it comes to the midterm and final”
SOC2517
“his class is a nightmare”
SOC2517

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The Online review describes heavy homework, unnecessary political content, and a poor professor experience.

Main concern

and concern about originality made the class stressful.

What students said

“Not a ”
SOC2517
“Add politics into class when it's not needed”
SOC2517

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because reviews mention little guidance for midterms and finals, but .

Midterm Guidance UnclearFinal Guidance UnclearRecommended Extra Class

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The In person review says there was no guidance for the midterm and final and .

Midterm Guidance UnclearFinal Guidance UnclearRecommended Extra Class
“no guidance when it comes to the midterm and final”
SOC2517
“an extra class before midterms and ”
SOC2517

Online

The Online review does not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His lectures are okay and sort of engaging but other than that his class is a nightmare”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“He doesn't give you much criteria to work with for tasks”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“Not a ”

🧪

30/100

“no guidance when it comes to the midterm and final”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not a good professor
  • His lectures are okay and sort of engaging
  • Add politics into class when it's not needed

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • his class is a nightmare

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • an extra class before midterms and
  • no guidance when it comes to the midterm and final

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because two recent reviews from both formats are consistent but still limited in number.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SOC25172 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values