AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Rebecca Colaw

PSYCHB1A · B1A · PSYCB5 · PSYCB1A · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
72.41%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a supportive professor and can keep up with reading, writing, and detailed rubrics.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but demandingClear rubricsHeavy readingTough gradingExtra credit
  • Students , and .
  • The and accelerated sections.
  • Grades are achievable with effort, but and workload create risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is realistic with rubrics, , and revisions, but the workload and .

Online evidence shows more grade risk from workload, while and corrections.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The content is understandable when students read and follow lectures, but , and fast pacing add challenge.

Online accelerated sections sound more demanding, while and follow instructions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many reviews mark attendance as mandatory, though a .

, while online evidence is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and clear, but negative reviews warn about grading, workload, and hands-off moments.

, while online reviews are more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, and revisions, but many students still call her a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tougher all-or-nothing grading more often, while and rubrics.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Students frequently mention lots of .

Format shift

Online reviews describe the heaviest workload, while but more manageable.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students describe her as , and engaging, despite some strong complaints about being hands-off or confusing.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are stronger, while online reviews include more complaints about independence and .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews mention homework, papers, discussions, quizzes, tests, projects, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests and quizzes more often, while , and written work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive overall, with , and balancing strict grading.

Main concern

and students must keep up with readings and assignments.

What students said

“She is a but if you stay on top of the work it's super easy.”
PSYCB1A
“She is a but just follow the instructions and you should be fine , as well .”
PSYCB1A
“ .”
B1A

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between very supportive experiences and complaints , and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“If you watch the lectures, read the textbook, and understand the concepts, it should be easy. Very time consuming, though.”
PSYCB1A
“This stats class was a fast-paced course, so a pretty heavy workload, but she was always responding to emails and willing to join a Zoom and help.”
PSYCB5
“I am really overwhelmed by her class and her very hands off approach does not help with the learning experience.”
B1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, quizzes, and projects, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam rules, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Four Tests MentionedWeekly Quizzes MentionedUnit ProjectsTests Can Be ToughExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tougher tests in one section and , but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Tests Were TougherNo Final TestUnit Projects
“ but if you study then you are good.”
PSYCB1A
“ .”
B1A

Online

and weekly quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Four TestsWeekly QuizzesPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“there were only 4 tests total.”
PSYCB5
“Every week its 1 chapter quiz with 10 questions and 1 homework assignment.”
PSYCB5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a tough grader, but of your work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She tries to connect with students and does an amazing job at it.”

⚖️

58/100

“She is a but just follow the instructions and you should be fine , as well .”

📚 Workload Reality

36/100

“Very time consuming, though.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a but if you stay on top of the work it's super easy.
  • Her class and lectures are interesting, she does grade a little hard but if you follow the .
  • She was an amazing teacher and good variety of assignments and and participation.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • personally didn't like that but to some it might be good.
  • She is a tough grader, but of your work.
  • Fairly easy class. and gives opportunities.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload Risk

  • Get ready to be drowning in notes every week; she has 40-50+ slides that contain notes.
  • I am really overwhelmed by her class and her very hands off approach does not help with the learning experience.
  • This stats class was a fast-paced course, so a pretty heavy workload.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 29 reviews across online and in-person formats, recent dates, detailed comments, and a consistent pattern of .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PSYCB1A17 reviews
PSYCB56 reviews
B1A4 reviews
PSYCHB1A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 4 · A 10

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

3

D+ 2 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1