AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Scott Warnert

B1A · MATHB22 · MATHB1A · B6A · MATHB6C · MATHB6A · MATHB70 · MATHB6B · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
35.29%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you are , and are comfortable with difficult exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTest HeavyTough ExamsCaring But DisorganizedExtra Credit
  • Many students say he is friendly and caring, but and too advanced.
  • because students report unexpected conceptual problems and .
  • Online reviews are especially negative, citing slow grading, disorganization, cheating accusations, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A good grade usually requires heavy self-study, tutoring, and .

and help, while online reviews more often describe unpredictable grading and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Math content is made harder by fast, advanced, and .

Both formats are challenging, but online reviews add more complaints about disorganization and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but many reviews say showing up matters because lectures and .

; online attendance requirements are inconsistent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recommendation is low because many students , and poor organization despite some positive support.

Online recommendation is especially weak, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

37/100

Curves, pity points, , and dropped scores help some students, but as harsh and hard to prepare for.

Format shift

; online grading receives more complaints about delays and accusations.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Homework, studying, tutoring, reading, software, and students.

Format shift

Online students mention reading, software, and late uploads; in-person students mention outside study and tutoring.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students often like him personally, but many say his lectures are confusing, fast, unstructured, or too advanced.

Format shift

Both formats report teaching problems, with online reviews more negative about organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Reviews repeatedly describe quizzes, tests, and exams as the main grade drivers.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, with online reviews .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, with some praise for caring support but many complaints that and .

Main concern

Students may struggle if .

What students said

“he doesn't know how to teach.”
MATHB1A
“ , and does want to help if you ask for it.”
MATHB1A

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with complaints about disorganization, slow , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Online students report weak structure and unpredictable exams.

What students said

“there is no conceivable way to prepare for them.”
MATHB6C
“ and likes to accuse students of cheating.”
MATHB22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because many students describe hard, unexpected, and heavily weighted tests despite some note or .

Test HeavyHard Conceptual ExamsUnexpected Word ProblemsCamera During ExamsOpen Book In One Online Review

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and difficult exams, but reviews do not clearly prove closed-book policy.

Test HeavyCurved TestsHard Word ProblemsDropped Lowest Exam
“ ”
MATHB1A
“The ”
MATHB1A

Online

Online evidence supports strict exam risk, including camera use in one review and open-book tests in another, so policies vary by section.

Camera During ExamsOpen Book In One ReviewHard Conceptual ExamsTest Heavy
“Makes you so it lessens the amount of cheating.”
MATHB6A
“All tests and .”
MATHB1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is funny and nice but he doesn't know how to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“He is funny and nice but he doesn't know how to teach.”

🧪

28/100

“The and he often used word problems with topics not covered in class.”

⚖️

37/100

“ , and does want to help if you ask for it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does not know how to teach at all he just speaks and expects you to retain the information.
  • he gets so excited that .
  • Scott is a .

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • there is no conceivable way to prepare for them.
  • Picks hardest problems from hw for
  • , and genuinely wants you to learn about math

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Structure

  • if you don't study the material.
  • His syllabus does not even have a breakdown of what will happen each week.
  • packets or notes provided either.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-four reviews across several years and both formats , and polarized support.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATHB1A14 reviews
MATHB226 reviews
B1A3 reviews
B6A3 reviews
MATHB6A3 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATHB6B3 reviews
MATHB6C1 review
MATHB701 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 5

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2