AI Rate Professor

History

Jason Stratton

HISTB4A · B1 · HISTORYB1 · HISTB4AB · HISTB1 · B2 · B4B · HISTORY · HISTB2 · HISTB36 · 168 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
12%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid Jason Stratton unless you can , and handle a heavy writing workload with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo FeedbackSlow GradingHeavy WritingPoor CommunicationAvoid
  • Students overwhelmingly report missing , and late or absent responses.
  • The workload is often described as , and papers.
  • A few students earned A grades, but many say the experience is stressful and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students still earned A grades, but the cost is high because , and writing workload is heavy.

and heavy writing, while in-person reviews add cancellations and off-topic lectures.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The history content may be introductory, but students , and unclear guidance as difficult.

Online reviews show the heaviest writing burden, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

marked optional and many others marked mandatory.

Both online and , so the format evidence is inconsistent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against taking him because of , and heavy workload.

Both formats are negative, but online reviews are especially severe about missing grades and no communication.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students describe grading as , and sometimes absent until the end, which makes the course feel harsh even when some A grades occur.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on no grades until the end, while and .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Many reviews mention heavy , and an unreasonable time burden.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the strongest workload complaints, while and papers.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students repeatedly say he does not teach, does , and leaves students to self-teach.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize no interaction, while , and poor Canvas management.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment appears , and quizzes rather than clearly supported exams.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention discussions, essays, and papers, while and online coursework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also mostly negative, citing , and poor communication.

Main concern

The main in-person risk is unreliable teaching , and unclear course management.

What students said

“Half of the classes were cancelled with little notice, including the first day.”
HISTB36
“Most of the class is spent with him off topic.”
HISTB1
“The professor never emailed back to any concerns I had.”
B1

Remote format

Online

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report severe communication , and a mostly self-taught course structure.

Main concern

The biggest online risk is finishing large amounts of .

What students said

“2 classes in a row that has meant no communication (email, canvas mail, , and no grades until semester end”
HISTB4A-B
“This class was a DISASTER! .”
B4B
“There is no teaching or interaction.”
B2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and some quizzes or exams, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or book policy.

Heavy WritingDiscussion PostsResearch PaperQuizzes MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exams in some cases, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Online WorkLarge PaperExams MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proved
“Most work was online with .”
B1
“Four non cumulative exams, 15 primary source postings, 30 responses and the paper.”
HISTB2

Online

Online reviews show reading, essays, discussion posts, papers, and some quizzes or exams, but Lockdown Browser.

Discussion PostsEssaysResearch PaperQuizzes MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proved
“His discussions are full 2-page essays, with an average of 2 being due each week on top of all the reading and quizzes.”
B4B
“requiring us and a 7-page paper.”
HISTB4A-B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is no teaching or interaction.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching support; credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

12/100

“ .”

📬 Communication Failure

12/100

“He did not grade anything, and .”

🧾 Workload Burden

10/100

“ ”

Theme 1

📬 About Communication and Feedback

  • .
  • He didn't answer emails or grade anything until week four of six after I emailed the dean.
  • The professor never emailed back to any concerns I had.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Reading, 2-3 pages of writing per assignment 2-3 times a week.
  • His discussions are full 2-page essays, with an average of 2 being due each week on top of all the reading and quizzes.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Experience

  • There is no teaching or interaction.
  • Cant rate a teacher who doesn't teach
  • Most of the class is spent with him off topic.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

168

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across online and in-person formats, with unusually , and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 557
4 out of 523
3 out of 59
2 out of 517
1 out of 562

Course coverage

B125 reviews
B4B6 reviews
HISTB4A5 reviews
HISTORY4 reviews
HISTB13 reviews
Show 6 more courses
HISTB4A-B2 reviews
506031 review
B21 review
HISTB21 review
HISTB361 review
HISTORYB11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C- 1

D range

2

D+ 2

F

7

F 7

No letter grade reported

26

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 12 · Not sure yet 12 · Rather not say 1