AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Myetta Beavers

CHDVB32 · B32 · CHDV21 · CHDVB36 · CHDVB21 · B21 · CHDVB42 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
29.41%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid her unless , and format-dependent inconsistency.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing GradingTough GraderLittle FeedbackAttendance MattersMixed Format Experience
  • Online reviews are strongly , and little feedback.
  • In-person reviews are mixed, with some students praising her knowledge and personality while others report the .
  • The biggest risk is not course content difficulty, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments , and lost points make an A unreliable.

Online reviews are harsher about grading confusion, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The subject matter is not usually described as hard, but and .

Online students report , while in-person views are more mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Online attendance is often not required, while mandatory.

Online reviews include several non-mandatory classes, but as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most because , and poorly explained.

Online recommendation is very weak, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly say grading makes no sense, , and comes with .

Format shift

, but online reviews are more consistently negative.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload varies by course, with some reviews mentioning many assignments and others saying the work itself is easy.

Format shift

Online reviews mention many assignments and papers, while in-person reviews range from .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A few students praise her knowledge and personality, but , and clarity are weak.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly poor, while and older.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews emphasize papers, homework, discussion boards, projects, assignments, and .

Format shift

Online evidence centers on assignments and discussion boards, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students praising her class but , and .

Main concern

Students say attendance and every point matter because and .

What students said

“first semester in person, she great.”
CHDVB36
“ . Just don't bother.”
B21
“There is no challenge and only about 10 homework assignments total but she grades so hard.”
B32

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with , and weak feedback.

Main concern

Online students report that unclear directions and .

What students said

“One of the worse online professors I have had.”
CHDVB21
“ !”
CHDVB42
“Do not bother with this class, she literally makes such an easy class difficult with !!”
CHDVB21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though some mention pop quizzes, tests, and .

Pop QuizzesNo Midterm MentionedTests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one class with , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policies.

No Midterm MentionedTests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“All the ”
CHDVB36
“A lot of the things on the .”
CHDVB21

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes and graded assignments, but do not clearly .

Pop QuizzesPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Beware of pop quizzes”
CHDVB36
“There are over 25 assignments with no due date.”
CHDVB42

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not bother with this class, she literally makes such an easy class difficult with !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️

18/100

“ !”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

35/100

“This professor is so difficult and does not know how to teach her lessons she has.”

👍 Recommendation Level

30/100

“ . Just don't bother.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • !
  • There is only 150-200 possible points earned so .
  • She is very picky about the homework and it is every week.

Theme 2

💻 About Online Classes

  • One of the worse online professors I have had.
  • There are over 25 assignments with no due date.
  • She also expects you to do experiments on kids and you have to find your own participants.

Theme 3

🏫

  • first semester in person, she great.
  • She is really funny and she knows her subject.
  • You can only rely on yourself to understand the chapters.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

The 18 reviews span many years and formats, with useful detail but .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CHDVB217 reviews
CHDVB363 reviews
CHDVB423 reviews
B212 reviews
B321 review
Show 2 more courses
CHDV211 review
CHDVB321 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1