AI Rate Professor

English

Alex Avila

ENGLB1 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
40.91%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

, and if you can tolerate weak organization and delayed grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLate gradingPoor communicationAmazing lecturesLots of homeworkGet ready to read
  • many in-person students like his personality, while online students report severe organization and .
  • Grades can still be high, but the , and .
  • The biggest risks , and assignment-heavy workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Many students earned A-range grades, but , and heavy assignments make the A stressful rather than easy.

Online grades can be high despite poor structure, while workload complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The content is not always intellectually hard, but , and inconsistent organization make the course harder to manage.

Online difficulty comes mostly from confusion and poor structure, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Attendance requirements vary across sections, with several in-person and one online review listing it as mandatory.

Online attendance is mostly not mandatory but has one mandatory review, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

39/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format because online reviews are mostly negative while .

Online evidence points to avoidance, while and serious organization problems.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report tough grading, harsh grading, surprise zeros, and .

Format shift

Online reviews are harsher about grading uncertainty, while and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and assignment-heavy pacing.

Format shift

and vague, while and deadline-driven.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some in-person students find him inspiring and funny, but many reviews report absence, poor communication, irrelevant lectures, and .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is poor, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews focus on papers, assignments, group projects, readings, and .

Format shift

Both formats point to .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for inspiring classes but repeated , and .

Main concern

Positive classroom energy is offset by disorganization and .

What students said

“I would take this class 100 times over.”
ENGL-B1
“ . Save yourself the stress.”
33631

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are consistently negative about communication, Canvas organization, vague assignments, and .

Main concern

Students often do not know their grades until very late.

What students said

“There wasn't a syllabus until 2 months into the course.”
ENGL-B1
“You wont even know what your grade is in the class half the time”
ENGL-B1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam use, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, midterm format, final format, or proctoring rules.

No Clear Exam Policy Evidence

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

No Clear Exam Policy Evidence

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Save yourself the stress.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“This professor is personally one of the very absent and I have not learned anything during this semester in his class.”

⚖️

28/100

“Assignments did not start being graded until 2/3 months after submission.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

39/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very inspiring and has a very unique way of teaching English
  • Makes his lectures fun as they are very interactive.
  • Lectures were not relevant, and notice.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • Only thing is he waits forever to grade.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • , if you have a question it has to wait.
  • he often won't answer emails
  • and not familiar with Canvas.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across online and and consistent picture of polarized teaching and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ENGL-B118 reviews
336313 reviews
336291 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2