AI Rate Professor

English

Tyler Richmond

ENGLISHB1A · ENGB50 · ENGLISHB50 · ENGLB53 · B60 · ENGLB1A · B50 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
60.47%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can attend, revise consistently, and accept a but others find stressful.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGrading contractFeedback heavyParticipation requiredPolarizing classroom toneWriting workload
  • Older , and , but recent reviews include many severe complaints.
  • The course can reward consistent effort, yet missed work or .
  • Most evidence is in person, with only two online reviews and one recent online withdrawal complaint.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The and an A possible, but attendance, revisions, and missed work make it risky for low-effort students.

Online evidence is too limited and mixed, while in-person evidence , and revision.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The writing tasks are not conceptually hard for many students, but the , and .

Online reviews stress heavy summer workload, while but frequent writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and several students say it directly affects the grade.

, while online attendance evidence is too limited to generalize.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on whether a student likes feedback-driven grading contracts or and .

Online evidence is split, while to many severe recent complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

The , but recent students often call the system flawed, strict, or unfair.

Format shift

Online evidence is mixed, while and harsh grading complaints.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Students describe , and revisions, though many call the tasks manageable.

Format shift

Online summer reviews report heavier workload, while .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and care are praised by many, but recent comments report weak lectures, hostile tone, and AI-related conflict.

Format shift

Online evidence is too small and split, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment is built around writing, participation, revisions, essays, and .

Format shift

Both formats point to assignment-based grading, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a and care versus recent frustration with , and classroom tone.

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“you are guaranteed a B if you do all of the work to the ”
ENGLISHB1A
“ .”
ENGLB1A
“Very hostile and immature. Don't get .”
ENGLB1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online evidence is limited and split between one strong recommendation and one heavy-workload withdrawal complaint.

Main concern

The online workload may be heavy in an 8-week course.

What students said

“his workload is heavy for the 8-week course.”
ENGLB1A
“ .”
ENGLISHB1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course appears writing-based, and , but most reviews do not describe exam rules.

No Test MentionedWriting-Based AssessmentFinal Paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one review says there was no test.

No TestFinal PaperEssays
“No test.”
ENGLB1A
“There's a that is pretty stressful”
ENGLB1A
“Class consist 1 article a week with annotations and a reflection, 3 mini essays and a research paper.”
ENGLB1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The main goal is to show genuine improvement in your writing capabilities using the comments Richmond and peer reviewers provided if you want to be credited.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“he takes time to give you feedback on how you can improve your writing throughout the semester.”

⚖️

50/100

“you are guaranteed a B if you do all of the work to the ”

🚪

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor is very kind and understanding so don't be afraid to ask any questions and participate.
  • By far the and he does good job in his lectures
  • Could expand the lectures more.
  • Very hostile and immature. Don't get .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • He has a very different grading system than the usual 0-100/letter grades.
  • Simply doing the class at the very least.
  • you miss 2 assignments you fail with no chance to make up for it.
  • His form of and makes it way tougher than a normal 0-100% system.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload And Feedback

  • but consisted of a lot of writing.
  • Took over summer, heavy workload but he gives a ton of feedback and .
  • and essays, drafts, and for you to go back in there and show you tried correcting.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The 50 reviews span many years with detailed comments, though recent reviews are much more negative than older ones.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENGLB1A22 reviews
ENGLISHB1A18 reviews
B503 reviews
ENGB503 reviews
310671 review
Show 3 more courses
B601 review
ENGLB531 review
ENGLISHB501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 3 · A 11

B range

17

B+ 4 · B 13

C range

6

C 6

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2