AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Michael Einhaus

PHILB18 · PHIL9 · PHILB7ONLINE · PHILB6A · PHILO6A · PHILB771698 · PHILB9 · PHIL · PHILB7 · PHILOB · PHILALL · PHIL9999 · PHIL9A · B9 · PHILLIFE · PHIL1 · EHTICS · PHILB1 · PHILO12 · PHILOB7 · PHIL07 · PHILB12 · PHIL7 · PHILB012 · B7B6AB9 · PHIL6AB7 · LOGICB7 · 196 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a demanding philosophy class that can improve your thinking and writing, but if you want an easy grade or gentle style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerIntellectually demandingStrong critical thinkingHeavy writing workloadPolarizing Socratic styleNot an easy A
  • Students consistently describe his classes as hard, time-consuming, and valuable for serious learners.
  • Many praise his intellectual depth and long-term impact, while others find him arrogant, harsh, or unclear.
  • Online evidence is small but and high workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Students repeatedly say good grades require serious time, strong writing, and as fair.

Both formats reject the easy-A idea, with online reviews naming 9-12 hours weekly and and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course content is intellectually demanding, especially logic, philosophy, argumentation, and advanced writing.

Online comments mention difficult logic concepts, while , and critical thinking.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but many older reviews do not clearly state an .

, while in-person evidence mixes mandatory recent entries with many unstated older entries.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and university preparation, but only for students willing to work hard and handle a blunt style.

Online reviews are positive but limited, while and polarized but often value the learning payoff.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students often call him fair but tough, with , and little room for weak logic.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited, while .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews mention hours of homework, long papers, difficult logic work, and .

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly cite 9-12 hours per week, while consuming.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He is often praised as insightful, helpful, and transformative, but some students find him arrogant, boring, or intimidating.

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly supportive, while and sharp personality complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize papers, , and essay tests more than regular exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention handouts and homework, while , and essay tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a demanding, discussion-heavy professor who can be inspiring for serious students and abrasive for others.

Main concern

The class is hard and his Socratic style can feel harsh or intimidating.

What students said

“This class must be the most difficult class I've taken yet, but it has been the most rewarding by far.”
PHILB9
“You can't help but learn from this man.”
PHIL9
“It is hard to ask questions because he makes you feel like you shouldn't have asked.”
PHILOB

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews show strong help and support, but one review says the workload was a true college-level shock.

Main concern

.

What students said

“He said it would take 9-12 hours a week, and it did.”
PHILB7ONLINE
“ .”
PHILB7
“he worked so hard to help me improve.”
PHIL

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention essay tests, papers, and homework, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, webcam use, or proctoring.

Essay Tests MentionedPapersHomeworkPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers, but do not clearly prove exam rules or .

Essay TestsPapers
“ .”
PHILB012
“You have to devote at least 8 hours to a it.”
PHILB9
“The ”
PHILB9

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to learn, not for ease.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and learning value. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“You can't help but learn from this man.”

🧠 Intellectual Challenge

28/100

“His classes are not meant to be easy, they're meant to teach you how to be a better thinker and writer.”

⚖️

32/100

“He grades fair, not easy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I love his teaching style, focusing on lecture and dialogue.
  • He uses the socratic method that is hard for some to understand.
  • It is hard to ask questions because he makes you feel like you shouldn't have asked.
  • and actually teaches his class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This class must be the most difficult class I've taken yet, but it has been the most rewarding by far.
  • This is not an easy A class.
  • He said it would take 9-12 hours a week, and it did.
  • He grades fair, not easy.

Theme 3

🧠 About Learning Value

  • Ancient Philosophy opened my eyes in so many ways!
  • I'll never forget the stuff i learned in this class
  • If you want to get better at writing and thinking, he is your man.
  • He won't be easy, but he will make sure you come out a better student.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

196

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across a long time span with many detailed comments, but some older entries are vague or off-topic.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 574
4 out of 533
3 out of 515
2 out of 520
1 out of 554

Course coverage

PHILB78 reviews
PHIL97 reviews
PHILB97 reviews
EHTICS2 reviews
PHIL2 reviews
Show 22 more courses
PHILB182 reviews
PHILB6A2 reviews
B7B6AB91 review
B91 review
LOGICB71 review
PHIL071 review
PHIL11 review
PHIL6AB71 review
PHIL71 review
PHIL99991 review
PHIL9A1 review
PHILALL1 review
PHILB0121 review
PHILB11 review
PHILB121 review
PHILB7716981 review
PHILB7ONLINE1 review
PHILLIFE1 review
PHILO121 review
PHILO6A1 review
PHILOB1 review
PHILOB71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values