AI Rate Professor

English

Jeffrey Eagan

ENGLISH110 · ENGLB1AL · B1A · ENGLISHB1A · CRN31533 · ENGLB2 · ENGB2 · ENGB1A · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
48.57%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Take him only if you want a demanding writing class and ; if you need gentle structure or an easy grade.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy writing workloadStrong feedback for somePolarizing teaching styleParticipation matters
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who find him transformative and students who find him harsh or unapproachable.
  • The course is writing-heavy, reading-heavy, and not an easy A.
  • Success seems to , and asking for help early.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

39/100

An A is possible, but students , and adapting to strict grading.

Online students often say effort can pay off, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is writing-intensive and often described as rigorous, with , and high expectations.

Both formats are challenging, but and classroom dynamics.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

as mandatory or say participation and showing up are central to passing.

In-person attendance is often mandatory, while online reviews focus more on .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

49/100

Students recommend him only if you want a demanding writing professor; many others strongly advise taking someone else.

Online reviews lean slightly more effort-for-reward, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly call him a , though , and high standards.

Format shift

reviews showing the strongest negative reactions.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of , and a major research paper.

Format shift

Online workload is heavy but structured for some students, while as stressful.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

many praise his passion and feedback, while many describe him as .

Format shift

Online , while in-person reviews show both strong admiration and severe frustration.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is , and research writing rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with strong praise for passion and feedback but severe criticism of and lectures.

Main concern

The , and a teaching style some students find intimidating or unclear.

What students said

“I learned so much while in his class.”
ENGB1A
“He is a and seems unapproachable.”
ENGB2
“Very easy to work with, .”
ENGB1A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but often say the class is tough, reading-heavy, and .

Main concern

The main concern is heavy workload and .

What students said

“The work is heavy but put in all the effort and you will make it.”
ENGLB2
“If you do all assignments on time and .”
B1A
“If you dont have a degree in English, you wont succeed in this class.”
ENGB1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe writing assignments and proctoring rules.

Research PaperIn-Class EssaysWeekly DiscussionsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and in-class essays, but do not clearly prove a .

In-Class EssaysFinal PaperResearch Paper
“There are also two in- or better.”
ENGLISH110
“a 2 pg, and 5 pg paper + a 10 pg research paper”
ENGB2

Online

Online reviews describe reading, assignments, papers, revisions, and discussions, but do not clearly prove .

Writing AssignmentsRevisionsWeekly Discussions
“There was a lot of reading assigned.”
B1A
“ , as expected, but they are tedious”
ENGB1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was hard but incredibly rewarding; it is not for the weak.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting polarized themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“He is amazing, has passion which is very important when it comes to teaching, and he was a good teacher.”

⚖️

25/100

“He is a and seems unapproachable.”

📚 Workload

24/100

“Writing writing writing... if you arent good at essays or make little mistakes he will mark you down hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I learned so much while in his class.
  • Lecture is unstructured and frustrating.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Don't put the effort, don't expect an easy A.
  • For the 5 page paper, there was only one A (average: D).
  • This class was hard but incredibly rewarding; it is not for the weak.

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Work

  • There is a lot of writing throughout the course but it is all necessary for and helpful.
  • The work is heavy but put in all the effort and you will make it.
  • Weekly papers and reading. OVERLOAD OF WORK.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-eight reviews across a long time span provide detailed and consistent evidence of a polarizing but rigorous professor.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

B1A15 reviews
ENGB1A9 reviews
ENGB26 reviews
ENGLB24 reviews
CRN315331 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGLB1AL1 review
ENGLISH1101 review
ENGLISHB1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 2

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 3

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Audit/No Grade 2 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1