AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kurt Klopstein

MATHB60 · B65 · MATHB1A · MATHB1B · B70 · B6E · CALCB6C · MATHB6E · B1A1 · B5060 · MATHB6A · MATHB70 · MATHB65 · MATHB6B · MATH6B · B50 · 88 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can keep up with homework and exams, but if you need a low-pressure math class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHomework-heavyTest-heavy gradingClear math explanationsAccessible outside classPolarizing difficulty
  • Many students call Klopstein clear, funny, and .
  • The class is often exam-driven, and but .
  • Reviews are polarized, with strong praise from prepared students and harsh criticism .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Good grades are possible, but students must do the and perform on exams because .

The online evidence is negative but too thin, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

He can make math clearer, but the , and math students.

; the single online review does not describe course content enough.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

as optional, but many reviews say skipping class makes passing much harder.

In-person attendance varies by section, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Recommended for and will do the work, but not for students who struggle with .

In-person sentiment is mixed but often positive, while the only online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

44/100

Some reviews call grading flexible or lenient, but , and .

Format shift

In-person evidence is mixed and detailed; online evidence .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

as heavy, even when students say it helps prepare for exams.

Format shift

, while online workload evidence is too limited.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Strong students often praise his clarity, resources, humor, and office-hour help, but others find him boring, fast, or unsupportive.

Format shift

but polarizing teaching experience; the single online review is negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Many students say the grade, with as preparation.

Format shift

, while online evidence mentions only an .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a mostly effective but and homework structure decide the experience.

Main concern

, and homework can be high even when it has low grade weight.

What students said

“ .”
B1A1
“ , but it helps”
B6E
“ .”
CALCB6C

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is negative and centers on a zero for a .

Main concern

Online evidence shows strict handling of an , but the sample is only one review.

What students said

“he so sarcastically gave me a zero on an exam”
MATHB1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often high-stakes and central to the grade, though some students say they are fair if you study the homework.

Test HeavyFew Grade ItemsNo Notes On ExamsOffline Homework Mirrors Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

often predicts exam questions, but no consistent proctoring or open-book policy is proven.

Test HeavyFew Grade ItemsNo Notes On ExamsOffline Homework Mirrors Exams
“ .”
MATHB1A
“ .”
B1A1
“ .”
CALCB6C

Online

The only online review mentions a zero on an exam but does not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policy.

Exam absence penaltyExam policy otherwise not clearly proven
“gave me a zero on an exam”
MATHB1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the homework and you will do good on the exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“He's a funny and .”

🧪

34/100

“ .”

📚 Workload

32/100

“ , but it helps and some .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes the subject so much easier to understand
  • His lectures are boring and he uses packets for notes
  • Klopstein is pretty much the perfect math professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • If you work hard an A is very possible!
  • whole letter grade.

Theme 3

📝 and Exams

  • The but looks so similar to the test
  • .
  • but definitely doable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

88

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset is large and detailed across many years, with consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 516
3 out of 510
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATHB1A14 reviews
B1A18 reviews
MATHB6B7 reviews
B6E4 reviews
B652 reviews
Show 11 more courses
CALCB6C2 reviews
MATH6B2 reviews
MATHB652 reviews
MATHB702 reviews
B501 review
B50601 review
B701 review
MATHB1B1 review
MATHB601 review
MATHB6A1 review
MATHB6E1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 4 · A 11

B range

14

B+ 2 · B 12

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 6