AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Peter LeGrant

PHILB7 · PHILB18 · PHILB19 · B7 · PHILOB6A · CRN72409 · 32400PHILB6A · PHIL7 · B6A · PHILB1001 · PHILB6A · PHILB10101 · PHILB10 · PHILB9 · PHILB750508 · B18 · PHIL19 · HISTB17A · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
73.58%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you like engaging lectures and , and a blunt classroom style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesHeavy readingFunny but bluntTest focusedClear grading
  • Most students praise his lectures and say he makes philosophy easier to understand.
  • , and showing up prepared.
  • A recurring minority describes him as rude, blunt, or unapproachable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is realistic with , and , but it is not a free A.

Online reviews sound easier and more flexible, while and test pressure.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

He often makes philosophy understandable, but the and .

Online students describe the material as easier, while and tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, but many reviews say showing up is important or required.

Online reviews mention optional Zoom or required discussion work, while and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and , though tone concerns lower confidence.

Both formats are generally positive, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and sometimes forgiving through dropped scores, but several students and papers.

Format shift

Online reviews mention straightforward grading and dropped work, while .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The , and exams, with some students calling it light and others reading-heavy.

Format shift

Online workload centers on lectures, quizzes, posts, and papers, while and exams.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students , and helpful, but repeated complaints about rudeness limit the score.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly positive, while and more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Grades , and occasional in-class essays.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, papers, tests, and discussions, while and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly favorable, with strong lectures and and test pressure.

Main concern

Some students find him rude or hard to approach, and .

What students said

“He makes complicated concepts easy to understand.”
B18
“If you do not read the book, you're going to fail.”
B7

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive, with , and flexible Zoom mentioned.

Main concern

Online , and discussion posts.

What students said

“Great professor, his lectures help a lot, and .”
B7
“ grade high.”
PHILB19

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show standard exam risk with quizzes, exams, study guides, papers, and some dropped scores, but .

Multiple Choice QuizzesIn-Person ExamsStudy GuidesDropped Lowest ScorePapers

Assessment risk

Standard

61/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention exams, quizzes, papers, in-class essays, study guides, and dropped scores, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

In-Class EssaysExamsQuizzesStudy GuidesDropped Lowest Exam
“There will be in-class essays that you write with .”
B18
“You'll get 4 exams, all in person. .”
PHILB7

Online

Online reviews mention multiple-choice exams or quizzes, papers, tests, and recorded lectures, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

Multiple Choice ExamsPractice QuizzesPapersDropped Lowest Work
“ , and the .”
B7
“2 papers and 2 tests. .”
PHILB19

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He makes complicated concepts easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He makes complicated concepts easy to understand.”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“If you do not read the book, you're going to fail.”

⚖️

62/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great professor, his lectures help a lot, and .
  • He makes complicated concepts easy to understand.
  • He is such a great teacher. Class discussions are always fun and he makes the lectures funny and interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A, but a passable class.
  • The if you paid attention.
  • The class average for the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • He was also a bit mean at times but he was not awful.
  • He is rude and make you feel like you do not matter.
  • . He is rude, unapproachable, and condescending.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years, with detailed and repeated patterns in , and tone.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 513
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 57

Course coverage

B79 reviews
PHILB79 reviews
PHILB106 reviews
PHILB185 reviews
PHILB193 reviews
Show 13 more courses
PHILB6A3 reviews
B182 reviews
PHIL72 reviews
PHILB92 reviews
32400PHILB6A1 review
B6A1 review
CRN724091 review
HISTB17A1 review
PHIL191 review
PHILB10011 review
PHILB101011 review
PHILB7505081 review
PHILOB6A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 5 · A 18 · A- 2

B range

16

B+ 6 · B 8 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1