AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Adel Shafik

RASTERART · ARTMULT · B20 · ADVERTISING · ARTB4 · GRAPHB21 · ARTB24 · ARTB41 · ART24 · 2DD · B4 · CRN71036 · ARTB2O · ART20 · ARTB20 · ARTB3AB · 77 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
58.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him only if , and learning independently when instructions are unclear.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderMandatory AttendanceMixed FeedbackCreative PushUnclear Instructions
  • Student experience is sharply mixed, with some praising his care and creativity while and .
  • Attendance and participation are often strict and can strongly affect the class experience.
  • Grades can be high, but students often describe the process as inconsistent, work-heavy, or frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn A-range grades, but comments warn that , and and effort.

Online evidence is weak for easy grades because students disliked the structure, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

61/100

The art content is often introductory or project-based, but and subjective critique make it feel harder than the material itself.

Online reviews make the course feel harder due to poor delivery, while on the course and student background.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

as mandatory, harsh, or necessary to pass.

Both online and including webcam requirements and in-person emphasizing showing up and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether a student values his old-school creative push or struggles with his and strict style.

Online reviews are clearly negative, while but include some strong praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Students often mention tough grading, few rubrics, subjective judgment, no late work, and .

Format shift

Online reviews criticize strict and unclear requirements, while and many strict-grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload often includes projects, reading, papers, chapter summaries, supplies, and fast assignment expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews mention not enough time and lots of homework, while , and reading.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

He is praised as caring and creative by some students but criticized by many for , and rude behavior.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated poorly, while and years.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Most evidence points to art projects, papers, reading summaries, critiques, participation, and a smaller role for tests or exams.

Format shift

In-person reviews mainly discuss projects and papers, while online reviews mention assignment timing and a final but not a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are split between students who find him caring and creative and .

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent feedback and , and .

What students said

“he has no rubrics so opinion of ur work.”
2DD
“He pushes his students to think creatively and that is good.”
ARTB4

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative and say the , and online structure.

Main concern

Online students report poor explanations, strict webcam expectations, and .

What students said

“ .”
ARTB4
“He requires you to use your webcam and leave it on or threatens to instantly fail you.”
ARTB41

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a and online webcam rules, but and not clearly documented across courses.

Final ChallengeWebcam RequirementAssignments And ProjectsUnclear Testing Requirements

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and an , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or formal proctoring.

Final ChallengeExams MentionedProject-Based Assessment
“The " that he expected no one to finish.”
ARTB20
“He is very clear on what things will be on the exams and .”
ARTB4

Online

Online reviews mention a and one webcam requirement, but they do not clearly prove Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring beyond webcam use.

Webcam RequiredTimed Final ConcernUnclear Testing Requirements
“He requires you to use your webcam and leave it on or threatens to instantly fail you.”
ARTB41
“For the what he wanted.”
ARTB4

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he has no rubrics so opinion of ur work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and attendance themes; credibility rating: High.

⚖️

34/100

“he has no rubrics so opinion of ur work.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Doesn't teach you anything.”

📌

12/100

“ & but he genuinely wants his students to improve!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He pushes his students to think creatively and that is good.
  • Doesn't teach you anything.
  • Rude and .

Theme 2

⚖️ And Feedback

  • .
  • He grades depending on his mood.
  • as long as and follow the criteria.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Attendance

  • Lot's of projects.
  • , and daily chapter summaries for H/W.
  • Very tough and participation.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

77

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The 50-review count is large and detailed, but opinions conflict strongly across courses, years, and formats.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 514
3 out of 511
2 out of 518
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ARTB413 reviews
ARTB2012 reviews
2DD4 reviews
B203 reviews
ADVERTISING2 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ARTB242 reviews
ARTB2O2 reviews
ARTB3AB2 reviews
ARTB412 reviews
B42 reviews
ART201 review
ART241 review
ARTMULT1 review
CRN710361 review
GRAPHB211 review
RASTERART1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 4 · A 13 · A- 4

B range

10

B+ 4 · B 6

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1