AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Sophia Marin

CRPSC01 · CRPSB5 · CRPSB4 · CRPS71144 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take Sophia Marin only if , and inconsistent support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough gradingLate feedbackHeavy workloadMixed teaching qualityCaring but inconsistent
  • Reviews are sharply split, but negative reviews repeatedly , and .
  • Online reviews show both easy-A praise and , and communication.
  • , but many students report and stressful group work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students earned A grades, but many say grades , and .

Online includes a few easy-A claims, while and confusing expectations.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content is not always intellectually extreme, but and .

Online reviews mention workload and weak instructions, while and hands-on project stress.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory, and participation appears important.

Both online and in-person reviews mostly report mandatory attendance or participation-heavy expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Recommendation is low because , and poor feedback.

Both formats include praise, but negative online and and intense.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly describe tough, picky, unclear, and .

Format shift

Online and and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and stressful group projects.

Format shift

Online complaints emphasize excessive weekly work, while and participation.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Praise for caring and hands-on teaching is outweighed by repeated reports of and weak guidance.

Format shift

Online reviews are split between helpful and unclear, while complaints about lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention labs, lecture questions, group projects, homework, exams, and .

Format shift

, and exams; in-person reviews mention group projects, participation, homework, and grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews praise her care and hands-on approach, but many students report , and .

Main concern

The main risk is unclear guidance combined with strict or .

What students said

“Professor Marin provides the thoughtful and Hands-On approach to studying crops.”
CRPSB4
“ and .”
CRPSB5
“ other students which was unprofessional, last minute grading prior to finals fails to support student goals.”
CRPSB4

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with some easy-A experiences but several severe , and weak instructions.

Main concern

Students and delayed grading without much help.

What students said

“As long as you put forth an effort and ask questions when needed, her class is an easy A!”
CRPSB5
“If you're a full-time student then prepare to BURN OUT a few times.”
CRPSB4
“Gave tons of assignments and , but had terrible spelling grammar, and almost no instructions for anything.”
CRPSB5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book requirements.

Exams MentionedTests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews mention exams and tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Exams MentionedTests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“most were just lecture questions along with while”
CRPSB5
“this made the ”
CRPSB5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, take another professor. and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ and .”

⚖️

25/100

“Inconsistent and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“She assigns way too much work each week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Marin provides the thoughtful and Hands-On approach to studying crops.
  • and .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a .
  • Inconsistent and .
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • If you're a full-time student then prepare to BURN OUT a few times.
  • She assigns way too much work each week.
  • Gave tons of assignments and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

There are 18 reviews across several years and both formats, with , and teaching clarity.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CRPSB510 reviews
CRPSB46 reviews
CRPS711441 review
CRPSC011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 7

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1