AI Rate Professor

Communication

Denise Norris

COMM1008 · COMB7 · COMB1 · COMM108 · COMMB1 · COMMB7 · COMMB8 · B8 · COOM7 · 67 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
25.71%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and self-directed group work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderPoor CommunicationGroup ProjectsDisorganizedLittle Teaching
  • Many recent , and weak communication.
  • Grades can still be high, but students often say the .
  • The class relies heavily on presentations, participation, and group work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Many students earned A-range grades, but comments say the , and .

Both formats show possible high grades, but online students .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material itself can be manageable, but , and group projects make the class feel harder.

In-person and online reviews both frame the difficulty as coming more from teaching and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory, and participation is a major part of the class.

Both formats include mandatory attendance or participation expectations, with only a few exceptions.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

Recent comments strongly advise against taking her because of rude behavior, poor communication, and limited teaching.

Online reviews are mostly negative, and older praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students often call her a and few items.

Format shift

Both online and especially focused on speech feedback.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The class is centered on presentations, group work, reading, and participation rather than constant exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention many presentations, while and reading.

Teaching experience

Poor

31/100

Many students say she relies on YouTube , and is often on her phone.

Format shift

Recent online and in-person reviews both report weak teaching, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears driven , and some reading-based work.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize projects and presentations more than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but strongly negative in recent years, especially about teaching quality, organization, and grading.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say she does little teaching and grades harshly or inconsistently.

What students said

“ .”
COMMB1
“She taught us more about her family then she did communication.”
COMMB8
“ .”
COMMB7

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with , and heavy presentation work.

Main concern

Students report and uncomfortable class interactions.

What students said

“ ”
B8
“Poor communication skills.”
COMMB8
“She does not know how to teach at all and always goes completely off topic.”
COMMB8

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention presentations, a midterm, and a final, but do not clearly prove a .

PresentationsFinal MentionedMidterm MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final, but do not clearly prove standard exam rules or proctoring.

Midterm MentionedFinal Mentioned
“We did a and she was on her phone the whole time”
COMMB7
“ ”
COMM1008

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book exams, or a .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does not teach anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

31/100

“She does not teach anything.”

⚖️

28/100

“She's very inconsistent, is a , but does very little teaching herself.”

👥 Class Structure

25/100

“You and no instruction on the topic you are supposed to do a presentation on.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't teach, just plays Youtube videos.
  • .
  • Not many lectures, just shows YouTube videos.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It felt impossible to get an A in this class.
  • She grades very harshly
  • Earned a good grade without her help.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • She never answers emails
  • Poor communication skills.
  • ."

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

67

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across many years, with consistent recent criticism and enough .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 59
3 out of 55
2 out of 58
1 out of 520

Course coverage

COMMB714 reviews
COMMB110 reviews
COMMB810 reviews
B85 reviews
COMB14 reviews
Show 4 more courses
COMM1083 reviews
COMM10082 reviews
COMB71 review
COOM71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 6 · A 17 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 5 · B 6

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 5