AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Matthew Meerdink

MATHB6A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and can tolerate slow, tangent-heavy lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringExtra CreditLenient GraderLecture HeavyTangents
  • Students , and willing to support students.
  • Grades are very achievable because of late work, , curves, and .
  • Teaching style is mixed because while others find lectures slow or boring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is highly achievable because reviews mention , and lenient grading.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Calculus and precalculus content still require effort, but his resources and .

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

no and several saying yes.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

and grade-friendly policies, but hesitation comes from slow lectures, tangents, and boredom.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

87/100

Students repeatedly mention lenient grading, , curves, accepted late work, and resources that make high grades realistic.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload sounds manageable because of flexible policies, but , and .

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

He is often described as caring and clear, but several students criticize tangents, slow pacing, and boring lectures.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention exams, homework videos, late work, , curves, and study guides, suggesting a mixed assessment structure.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All evidence is from in-person classes, where students , and mixed lecture pacing.

Main concern

Lectures may feel slow, boring, or off topic for some students.

What students said

“An A is 100% achievable in this course.”
MATHB6A
“Goes on to many tangents. . Super boring.”
MATHB6A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show student-friendly exam support , and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Notecard on ExamStudy GuidesCurved ExamsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention curved exams, a , and , but do not clearly prove closed-book, open-book, or proctoring rules.

Notecard on ExamStudy GuidesCurved ExamsExtra Credit
“ if class struggled.”
MATHB6A
“He accepts late work, ”
MATHB6A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take this Professor! An A is 100% achievable in this course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Great way of explaining material and gives students multiple ways to approach problems.”

📈 Grade Support

86/100

“An A is 100% achievable in this course.”

⚖️

87/100

“ . Super boring. Self study and you'll be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Meerdink truly cares about his students and .
  • He went on many tangents and .
  • Great way of explaining material and gives students multiple ways to approach problems.

Theme 2

📈

  • He accepts late work,
  • if class struggled.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

, but there is no online evidence and teaching opinions are mixed.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATHB6A4 reviews
503763 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1