AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Thomas Wallace

CRIMB2 · CRIMB3 · CRIMB4 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if and can handle reading, exams, and projects without expecting an effortless A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging LecturerParticipation MattersReading RequiredTest and Project HeavyMixed Grading Fairness
  • Many students praise Wallace as funny, knowledgeable, and engaging.
  • Grades can be strong, but students must keep up with , and projects.
  • Recent negative , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Good grades are common, but students need reading, participation, exams, and projects, and .

Online reviews conflict sharply, while some grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The class can feel straightforward, but , and case briefs add real work.

Online difficulty depends on pace, while in-person reviews describe participation-heavy classes with exams and projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most in-person reviews mark attendance mandatory and say participation matters, while .

Online attendance is optional in the two reviews, but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but grading and workload complaints keep the recommendation from being strong.

Online recommendation is mixed, while but not risk-free.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some students say grading is clear or not too hard, but others call him a and .

Format shift

Online evidence is split between easy grading and low-feedback grading, while .

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Workload commonly , and participation.

Format shift

Online workload can be heavy in six-week courses, while .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Many students find him knowledgeable, funny, and engaging, but the lowest reviews describe poor course management or .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mixed, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and participation rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams and written work, with online reviews also stressing daily or weekly writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about lectures and personality, but , and .

Main concern

Attendance and participation are often mandatory, and .

What students said

“His class is straightforward and easy, just keep up with the , and participate.”
CRIMB2
“ ”
CRIMB3
“ and four exams; do the work and you'll be fine.”
CRIMB2

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between a great summer experience and a heavy six-week workload with .

Main concern

The online workload can become intense in a short term.

What students said

“For this class to be a six week class it was not too hard at all.”
CRIMB3
“His work load was way too heavy for a six week course.”
CRIMB3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe standard to demanding exams with essays, timed tests, quizzes, and projects, but .

Timed ExamsEssay ExamsQuizzesMidtermFinalProjects

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes, midterms, finals, and projects, but reviews do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Timed ExamsEssay QuestionsMidtermFinalFour Exams
“He has hard exams their timed 2 hours no redo's”
CRIMB3
“Midterm and and are about 10-15 questions.”
CRIMB4
“ and four exams; do the work and you'll be fine.”
CRIMB2

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, a midterm, and a final, but reviews do not clearly .

Weekly QuizzesMidtermFinal
“We had to read the whole book, with and a final, and two papers.”
CRIMB3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and four exams; do the work and you'll be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“He is so knowledgeable about this subject, and is truly willing to teach you everything he knows.”

⚖️

45/100

“Uninteresting class, no .”

📚 Workload Reality

46/100

“His work load was way too heavy for a six week course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Wallace has a great sense of humor and knows his subject well.
  • An amazing teacher gave me perspective on life.
  • Fantastic, easy going, always available to help after class hours, easy to contact, fast response time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Literally just show up to class and participate, he's really cool and .
  • The , but if you stay engaged and use your textbook, they're manageable.
  • I really had high hopes for this professor but

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • and four exams; do the work and you'll be fine.
  • We had to read the whole book, with and a final, and two papers.
  • There are 2 major projects due

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

73/100

Evidence confidence

There are 12 reviews with useful detail and recent data, but opinions are polarized and online evidence is limited to two reviews.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CRIMB25 reviews
CRIMB35 reviews
CRIMB42 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1