AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Thomas Greenwood

MATH22 · MATHB60 · MATHB22 · B70 · MATHB50 · MATHB70 · MATHBD · MATHB6B · MATH60 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
65.38%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take Greenwood if and can keep up with regular homework and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math lecturesHeavy homeworkTough gradingHelpful office hoursAttendance matters
  • Students and examples.
  • , and exam preparation.
  • A few students describe him as strict or hard to approach when they struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible, but students , and exam preparation.

Online evidence is mixed, while in-person evidence strongly shows effort-for-grade rather than an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The teaching makes math clearer, but Calculus, Statistics, and algebra content are often described as challenging.

Online comments split between clear lectures and self-teaching, while practice.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory or say skipping class will hurt performance.

Both online reviews are mandatory, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, but the workload and strict grading keep him from being universally safe.

Online reviews are split, while warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Many students call him a , and several say minor mistakes or .

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

as daily, chapter-based, or necessary for quizzes and exams.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, but .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students consistently praise his clarity, examples, humor, and willingness to help outside class.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is polarized, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

63/100

Grades , and participation depending on the course.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions lectures and workload, while , and labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews mostly praise clear lectures, examples, humor, and office-hour help, but , and .

Main concern

The class is not an easy A because , and .

What students said

“ , so come to class.”
MATHB6B
“If you put in the time, effort, and energy, you should do well in this class.”
MATHB22
“Not an easy A!”
MATH22

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with one strong praise for lectures and one complaint about recorded videos and rigid expectations.

Main concern

Online support and flexibility may feel inconsistent.

What students said

“Professor Greenwood is the .”
MATHB6B
“Online lectures? Videos he recorded. You're teaching yourself.”
MATHB22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are common and , but comments do not consistently prove a .

Chapter ExamsQuizzesReview DaysTests Similar To HomeworkOne-Sheet Final Note Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, homework-based test questions, and one final that allowed a note sheet.

Chapter ExamsWeekly QuizzesReview DaysHomework-Based QuestionsOne-Sheet Final Note
“Exams are at the end of .”
MATHB6B
“ and but he allows a sheet, front and back, for the final.”
B70
“most of your quiz and .”
MATHB6B

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, take-home, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Greenwood was one of the . His lectures are extremely helpful in comprehending the material, so come to class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ , so come to class.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“He will assign a lot of homework so you want to make sure to stay on top of it.”

⚖️ Grade Difficulty

35/100

“Do the HW & go to office hours! Makes u work for ur grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He makes sure you understand and helps a lot by doing examples on the board.
  • His lectures are simple and easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A!
  • It is challenging but doable.
  • Just do the homework and pay attention and your'e set!

Theme 3

📌

  • !
  • Do the homework! He will state this all semester.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-six reviews across many years show repeated, detailed , and attendance.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATHB2213 reviews
MATHB6B12 reviews
MATHB707 reviews
B704 reviews
MATH223 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH602 reviews
314731 review
715151 review
MATHB501 review
MATHB601 review
MATHBD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 1 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2