AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Mary Swearinger

ANTH73991 · ANTHB2 · ANTHB1L · ANTHB1 · ANTHROB1 · 50185ANTHB2 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
79.17%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a manageable anthropology course, but do .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy gradingClear criteriaReading requiredMixed responsivenessOnline-friendly
  • Most students describe the classes as easy with .
  • Grades are usually friendly, especially when students keep up with readings and discussions.
  • The and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Grades are usually easy because , and appears in several reviews.

Both formats support an easy-A pattern, with stronger and more recent evidence from online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students repeatedly call the content simple, though reading, papers, and .

Online and , while online reviews mention more weekly structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

mandatory and others clearly optional.

Online reviews are split between mandatory and not mandatory, while as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

, but communication complaints prevent a stronger rating.

Online reviews are mostly positive but include the strongest complaints, while but sparse.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Many students report A , and .

Format shift

Both formats support lenient grading, with online reviews giving more direct evidence.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Work is manageable but , and exams.

Format shift

Online reviews show more workload variation, while but regular workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students often praise her organization and lectures, but and .

Format shift

Online reviews are more polarized, while and mostly positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

57/100

Grades appear to come , and occasional .

Format shift

Both formats mention discussions, papers, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews also call the class easy, with , and .

Main concern

Attendance and participation can matter, and one student felt the teaching was too hands-off.

What students said

“Truly easy class and no textbook required!! :)”
ANTHB1
“The class may be super easy but the purpose of school is to learn and her job is to TEACH.”
ANTHB1
“Just complete the weekly discussions and youll have an easy A.”
50185ANTHB2

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are mostly positive and describe easy grading, , and tests.

Main concern

Several online students complain about slow or and .

What students said

“ .”
ANTHB2
“The .”
ANTHB1L
“She is a and provides that is not very hard.”
ANTHROB1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and finals but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring rules.

Weekly DiscussionsPapersMidtermFinalMultiple Choice Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

63/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and easy exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

MidtermFinalMultiple ChoiceTrue Or False
“a midterm and final each containing 50 questions with 3 hour limit of multichoice and true or false questions.”
ANTHB1
“ and the and explained more than the book.”
50185ANTHB2

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, exams, and finals, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

QuizzesExamsFinalPapers
“The tests were 40 MC, 20 T/F, 5 Short answer questions.”
ANTHB1
“Good class with a , and , and a final.”
ANTHB1L

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“The workload was not heavy; , and .”

📈 Easy A Signal

88/100

“Just complete the weekly discussions and youll have an easy A.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

62/100

“One thing I didn't like was her not providing feedback or responding to emails in time.”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • She is not a ; she understands that you have classes outside of hers.
  • She is a and provides that is not very hard.
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Has about 4 assignments a week one of them being a .
  • Very simple class, reading is required for .
  • She doesn't have many assignments, so if .

Theme 3

💬 About Support

  • Responded and was very thoughtful and understanding.
  • The .
  • She actually stopped responding to me after just emailing her once.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 24 reviews span 2018 to 2025, include both formats, and .

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANTHB18 reviews
ANTHB27 reviews
ANTHB1L6 reviews
50185ANTHB21 review
ANTH739911 review
Show 1 more courses
ANTHROB11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 3 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3