AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Andrea Bridges

72056B1AL · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you are a serious math student , and a polarizing teaching style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLots of homeworkLecture heavyClear criteriaPolarizing
  • Student opinion is sharply split between clear, rigorous teaching and .
  • The , and a lot of homework.
  • Several students report harsh grading, low flexibility, withdrawals, and negative classroom interactions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments , and tolerance for strict grading.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The math content is challenging and often tied to , and difficult exams.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

, and students say attending is essential.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on student fit because strong praise is offset by multiple severe complaints and withdrawals.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and several students describe point-based grading, zeros, withdrawals, or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

as lots of work and necessary for quizzes and exams.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

47/100

Some students praise clear lectures, but repeated severe complaints about confusion, questions, and support pull the score down.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades appear driven heavily by tests, quizzes, and as preparation.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All reviews are in person and show a highly polarizing class with and .

Main concern

, and reported poor responses to questions create high risk.

What students said

“Lots of homework, but it's necessary.”
72056-B1AL
“Beware of asking questions, she will loudly sigh!”
72056-B1AL

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews explicitly describe , and quizzes tied to homework.

No CalculatorsNo Cheat SheetsHigh-Point ExamsHomework-Based Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

cheat sheets and carry high point value.

No CalculatorsNo Cheat SheetsHigh-Point ExamsHomework-Based Quizzes
“She doesn't allow calculators or cheat sheets for her exams and they are 100 pts each!”
72056-B1AL
“Quizzes are just writing down whatever .”
72056-B1AL

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and polarized teaching experience. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

47/100

“ , and attending is essential.”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

📚 Workload

25/100

“Lots of homework, but it's necessary.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and thoroughly, she's a but strict but nothing crazy.
  • , and attending is essential.
  • Her way of solving equations is so is talking about.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She gives you exactly what you need to ace all the tests
  • Lots of homework, but it's necessary.
  • she grades on a so the moment you mess up once your grade is practically done for

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • !
  • Does not like answering questions during lecture.
  • Please just save your time and effort.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 12 recent in-person reviews with detailed, consistent evidence of both strong supporters and severe critics.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

72056-B1AL12 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1