AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Carolyn Lane

CHDVB36 · CHDVB21 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you need structure or real teaching, even though the .

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganizedPoor communicationEasy gradingConfusing due datesSelf-taught risk
  • Most reviews describe serious organization and communication problems.
  • The course can be easy to pass, but students often say they learned little.
  • Online reviews are especially negative, while and frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A appears easy because several students report easy work, few grading barriers, and .

, while online evidence shows the disorganization can still hurt grades.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The material is described as easy and manageable, but course structure and instructions make it frustrating.

, while online reviews say unclear setup makes the same course harder to complete.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

reviews saying no and several in-person reviews saying yes.

Online attendance is mostly flexible, while as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students warn against taking her because of poor organization, weak communication, and low learning value.

, while in-person reviews include a few positive easy-class experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Several students report A grades and one says she gives good grades regardless of effort.

Format shift

, while online grading outcomes are less predictable because of unclear structure.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The work itself is often easy, but online students describe bursts of assignments and .

Format shift

In-person workload sounds light, while online workload feels heavier because deadlines and .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most reviews describe poor organization, poor communication, off-topic lectures, and little real support.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is strongly negative, while but still includes serious learning complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Comments focus on assignments, group projects, modules, presentations, and .

Format shift

and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students loving the easy, fun class and others saying lectures are off-topic and unhelpful.

Main concern

The class may feel easy but low-value if you want real learning.

What students said

“Will give you a good grade no matter what you submit.”
CHDVB36
“I did not learn anything from her or her lectures and had to do the learning on my own.”
CHDVB21

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing missing due dates, unclear instructions, dead links, weak responses, and poor course structure.

Main concern

Students and deadlines with little support.

What students said

“No communication, no support, completely inaccurate due dates, and the entire course seems to be copy / pasted.”
CHDVB21
“This is the worst structured late start class I've ever .”
CHDVB21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The presentation, while other exam policies are not clearly proven.

Group Project FinalReviews do not clearly prove exam proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but does not clearly prove broader exam rules.

Group Project FinalPresentation Final
“For the and present it.”
CHDVB21

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No communication, no support, completely inaccurate due dates, and the entire course seems to be copy / pasted.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching value. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“I did not learn anything from her or her lectures and had to do the learning on my own.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

20/100

“ .”

💯

86/100

“Will give you a good grade no matter what you submit.”

Theme 1

🚩 About Organization

  • No communication, no support, completely inaccurate due dates, and the entire course seems to be copy / pasted.
  • No due dates, no syllabus, no deadlines.
  • and went on tangents about random things.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Difficulty

  • Will give you a good grade no matter what you submit.
  • The work is easy and manageable.
  • Although her work is fairly easy, there are no accurate due dates, syllabus, updated links, or .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Value

  • but I have had 2 classes with her and have literally learned nothing.
  • , though she sometimes goes off topic.
  • She spends the first half of lecture on nonsense and doesn't talk about the actual class until 30 minutes later.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across online and and recent evidence with a consistent negative pattern.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CHDVB219 reviews
CHDVB361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1