AI Rate Professor

English

Anthony Huffaker

ENGLISHB1A · B1A · B1AL50420 · ENGL31830 · ENGB1A · ENGLB1A · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
56.1%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take him if you can follow detailed writing rules closely, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear rubricsTough essay gradingThree-paper structureHelpful in personAI detector risk
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who find the course clear and easy and .
  • In-person reviews are generally stronger than online reviews, with more praise for , and .
  • A major , and AI-detection accusations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn A grades, but the grade depends , and avoiding major grading flags.

In-person reviews show more easy-A and extra-credit evidence, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course content is usually described as straightforward English work with three major papers and manageable reading.

Both formats describe simple course structure, but online students .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Many in-person reviews say attendance is mandatory or important, while .

, while online evidence is mixed and less central.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

and direct lectures, but many warn about harsh grading and feedback problems.

Recommendation is stronger in person and weaker online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grades can be fair for students who follow the rubric, but and low paper averages.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tougher grading more often, while and clearer support.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The workload is usually three major papers plus reading or small assignments, but deadlines and .

Format shift

Both formats describe a limited number of major assignments, with online students feeling more pressure from few graded items.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He is praised for humor and , but criticized for , and hostile communication in some reviews.

Format shift

feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and occasional quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats rely mainly on essays and written assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive, with , and .

Main concern

Attendance and , and .

What students said

“Take his class in person he gives .”
B1A
“Took him in person,which I feel is great because you genuinely get to see how he lectures and learn.”
ENGLB1A

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but lean risky because , and strict paper grading.

Main concern

Online students report strict grading on a small number of major papers.

What students said

“Class was graded on 3 essays.”
ENGLB1A
“He does not accept late work so make sure not to miss any deadlines.”
ENGB1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a standard exam policy; the .

Three Major PapersFinal Paper RequirementSmall Reading QuizzesNo Clear Exam Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and occasional pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove a standard exam format or proctoring policy.

Three PapersPossible Pop QuizzesFinal Paper
“ .”
ENGB1A
“ because they are helpful towards the end where you combine everything you learned into the final.”
ENGB1A

Online

Online reviews mention three essays, small quizzes, and final paper risk, but do not clearly .

Three EssaysFinal Paper RequirementSmall Quizzes
“Class was graded on 3 essays.”
ENGLB1A
“ .”
ENGLB1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take his class in person he gives .”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“His lectures are amazing and .”

⚖️

52/100

“ and has odd rubrics with structures that are .”

📌 Format Difference

56/100

“Take his class in person he gives .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is straight to the point and so funny and fun!
  • Great guy, been through a lot but still kept a smile on him every day in class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you follow his writing structure you will be sure to get an A.
  • Very strict when it comes to any late work whatsoever and your grade in this English class is dependent on 3 assignments

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Outright fails students with low 20% AI usage without even checking the flagged content.
  • He doesn't really teach anything.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 41 reviews cover many , and consistent themes.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 56
3 out of 50
2 out of 58
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENGLB1A17 reviews
ENGB1A14 reviews
B1A6 reviews
ENGLISHB1A2 reviews
B1AL504201 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL318301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 3 · A 16 · A- 4

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1