AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Virginia Burroughs

SOILB1 · SOILSB1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her if you want a manageable online soil course, but and expect .

Best fit · Effort For RewardNice but unevenTest heavyLight workloadSlow gradingCommunication issues
  • Most online students describe the class as easy if work is completed.
  • Testing and grading are recurring concerns despite generally manageable content.
  • Older , and distracting lecture videos.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades are achievable with steady work, but , and team work can block an easy A.

Online evidence is mostly manageable, while the + but described very high effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students often call the material easy, though some need outside help and test preparation.

Online reviews mostly say the content is easy, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Attendance is mixed across reviews, with some online students reporting no requirement and .

, and the as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but the strongest negative reviews warn about communication, grading delays, and inconvenient tests.

Online reviews are mostly favorable, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Students mention tough grading and test-heavy structure, but and appear in some online reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews are mixed on grading, while the .

Workload

Moderate

56/100

Several students call the work easy or light, but others mention lots of , and tests.

Format shift

Online workload is usually manageable but not effortless; the in-person review describes the course as hard.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Students describe her as nice and sometimes helpful, but lecture quality, response time, and .

Format shift

but mostly acceptable; the only in-person review is negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

, and few graded items, with labs and team work also appearing.

Format shift

Both formats point toward test-heavy grading, with limited in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and describes hard learning conditions, slow responses, and .

Main concern

The single in-person review reports poor communication and .

What students said

“She's hard to get ahold of and takes her time to get back to you and grades your work weeks after.”
SOILB1

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive about ease and workload, but , and lecture quality issues.

Main concern

Tests and .

What students said

“Just do the work. She provides everything you need to be successful in this class.”
SOILB1
“Loved this class but she is definitely makes you work for your grade.”
SOILSB1
“ , super inconvenient.”
SOILSB1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly show a , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Test HeavyQuizzesLimited Test WindowFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review calls the course test heavy but .

Test Heavy
“ ”
SOILB1

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, exams, tests, and a short nighttime test window, but .

Test HeavyQuizzesLimited Test Window
“ , super inconvenient.”
SOILSB1
“The and provide all the information to ace the quizzes.”
SOILB1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just do the work. She provides everything you need to be successful in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“ and understandable”

📌 Workload Reality

56/100

“The work is easy but there is a lot to do.”

⚠️

42/100

“she took a little while .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and understandable
  • The and provide all the information to ace the quizzes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The workload is light.
  • Loved this class but she is definitely makes you work for your grade.
  • Overall, if you do your work, it's a very easy class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Problems

  • She's hard to get ahold of and takes her time to get back to you and grades your work weeks after.
  • , super inconvenient.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across 2021 to 2025 give useful but uneven evidence, with .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SOILB15 reviews
SOILSB12 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values