AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Lidia Torres

INDR11 · INDR1120A · CADD · INDR10 · ARCH3132 · ARCHB16 · ARCH22 · INDR1011 · ARCHB33 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take Lidia Torres if you want a and makes projects manageable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring MentorHelpful FeedbackBeginner FriendlyFun ProjectsSometimes Disorganized
  • Students strongly , and hands-on help.
  • Grades appear very achievable when students keep track of assignments and complete projects.
  • The main weakness is occasional disorganization or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

High grades look realistic if , and keep track of project requirements.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students usually find the courses manageable and supportive, though some design and CADD work may not feel fully beginner level.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

Some reviews list attendance as mandatory, but comments and absences.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend her because , and gives useful critiques that improve work.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students describe clear criteria, chances to fix critiques, , and passing as very achievable.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

, but most students say it feels manageable or interesting rather than punishing.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly describe her as patient, prepared, helpful, knowledgeable, and caring.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews focus on projects, assignments, critiques, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

All evidence is in person, and students mostly describe her as caring, helpful, and .

Main concern

Some students mention disorganization or .

What students said

“One of the .”
ARCHB16
“she was very disorganized, did not follow the syllabus she gave us, and .”
ARCH3132

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do , and the course evidence is mainly project and assignment based.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“SHE IS AN AMAZING PROFESSOR, SHE ALWAYS HAS ANSWERS FOR EVERYTHING.”

💬

90/100

“The good thing is that she gives good critiques and allows you to fix them.”

📈 Grade Effort

84/100

“make sure to keep track of and you'll pass with a higher grade than I did!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a total sweetheart and .
  • She answered everyone's questions clearly and even though there were people in the class who already knew AutoCad, she still made the class feel beginning, yet challanging.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • may be giving you trouble.
  • Always respected peoples time and always understood if people were busy and could not make it to class.

Theme 3

🧩 About Organization & Work

  • There is a bit of homework but it does not feel like work because she makes it interesting and fun.
  • Major fault however is her organization antics, whether being from covid or being spread too thin.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is useful but partly old, with 15 in-person-only reviews and limited recent grade detail.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARCHB164 reviews
ARCH222 reviews
INDR102 reviews
705941 review
ARCH31321 review
Show 5 more courses
ARCHB331 review
CADD1 review
INDR10111 review
INDR111 review
INDR1120A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values