AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gurpreet Grewal

MATH22 · MATHB60 · MATHD · MATHB22 · BA00 · MATHB1B · MATHB1A · PRECALCULUS · MATHB50 · B22 · MATHB6A · MATHBA · MATHBD · CALCULUS · MATHB6B · MATH50 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

unless you are , and can tolerate inconsistent lectures and grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent TeachingTest HeavyTough GradingHard to ReachSelf-Study Needed
  • Recent reviews are sharply negative, citing , and weak communication.
  • Older reviews are mixed, with some students finding him helpful or easy if they already manage the work.
  • A high grade is possible for some students, but many comments say .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A grades, but many comments say success depends on self-study, homework, tutoring, or already knowing the material.

Online evidence is strongly negative, while with many hard-work warnings.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Math content , and tests that students say do not always match instruction.

Online reviews describe poor course management, while and uncovered material.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory or warn that skipping class hurts performance.

Both online and in-person evidence often lists attendance as mandatory, though .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

The low recommendation pattern comes from repeated , and course organization.

Online reviews are entirely negative, and in-person reviews are mixed but strongly negative in recent comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Many students call him a tough or partial credit.

Format shift

Online reviews call grading unfair, while and a few partial-credit positives.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and heavy time demands.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework, and in-person reviews repeatedly tag the class as homework-heavy and test-heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Comments repeatedly cite unclear lectures, late or unfinished material, weak responsiveness, and inconsistent preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on management and communication failures, while and skipped content.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

The course is repeatedly described as test-heavy, with quizzes, exams, and grades based on few things.

Format shift

Both formats describe test-heavy assessment, with in-person reviews giving broader evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative, especially in recent years, with , and grading.

Main concern

Many students say , and tests can cover poorly taught content.

What students said

“When he lectures, it seems like if he's learning the material with us and doesn't know what he's talking about.”
MATHB22
“I was able to pass with an A, but only because I relied on youtube videos and tutoring.”
MATHB6A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly negative, citing late , and .

Main concern

Students report poor responsiveness and serious course management problems.

What students said

“He was .”
MATHB6A
“Almost impossible to reach outside of class.”
MATHB6A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a test-heavy and , but they do not clearly prove online proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Test HeavyTough TestsFew Graded ItemsNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

items, and little partial credit, but no clear closed-book policy is proven.

Test HeavyTough TestsFew Graded ItemsNo Partial Credit Complaints
“does not give partial credit”
MATH22
“ but crucial if u miss a couple.”
MATHB22

Online

Online reviews mention test-heavy structure and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Test HeavyPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“ ”
MATHB6A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was able to pass with an A, but only because I relied on youtube videos and tutoring.”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“When he lectures, it seems like if he's learning the material with us and doesn't know what he's talking about.”

⚖️

25/100

“Not even a .”

🧪

30/100

“ and he never hands back the tests”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Grewal's lectures were difficult to follow.
  • He just reads the book. I can do that by myself.
  • Very unprepared, just read examples straight from the book.
  • He is funny and caring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I was able to pass with an A, but only because I relied on youtube videos and tutoring.
  • An easy A if you show and ask questions.
  • This class was fairly easy. The , but their wasn't many.
  • If you understood the material, the .

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests and Grading

  • does not give partial credit
  • but crucial if u miss a couple.
  • , but mostly due to errors on his part.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Course Management

  • He was .
  • Almost impossible to reach outside of class.
  • he didn't even cover chapter 5 because he ran out of time.
  • Leaves lectures unfinished because he just wants to go home

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The 48 reviews span many years and courses, with enough detail to show both old mixed praise and recent strong negative patterns.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 510
3 out of 58
2 out of 57
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATHB508 reviews
MATHB227 reviews
MATHB6A6 reviews
MATHB1A4 reviews
MATHB1B4 reviews
Show 11 more courses
B223 reviews
MATHBD3 reviews
MATH222 reviews
MATHB602 reviews
MATHBA2 reviews
MATHD2 reviews
BA001 review
CALCULUS1 review
MATH501 review
MATHB6B1 review
PRECALCULUS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1