AI Rate Professor

English

Sarah Long

ENG101 · B17A · ENGB1A · B1A · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid unless you are confident with , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Writing LoadStrict RubricsExtra Credit RescueWeak Support
  • Most reviews describe harsh and .
  • Students report , and little flexibility on mistakes.
  • A , but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears difficult because many students report , and heavy paper standards despite some .

Online evidence is much harsher, while but still warns about real work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course content is not described as advanced, but MLA rules, readings, papers, and .

Online reviews stress confusion and , while , and paper workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

but mandatory in several others, especially for participation-heavy sections.

Online attendance is mixed, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because they describe the grading as , and emotionally draining.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while but still risky.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly , and zeros on assignments.

Format shift

, but online comments are more severe.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews repeatedly mention many papers, lots of , and demanding essay work.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize workload and papers, while and participation.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most reviews describe poor support, unclear expectations, and negative classroom experience, despite a .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is mostly negative, while but real positive minority.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven , and written assignments rather than clearly described exams.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on essays and proofreading, while and reading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with two strong positive reviews but several reports of , and many papers.

Main concern

Attendance and participation can matter, and .

What students said

“Absolutely no late work, very tough on grading papers which are a majority of grade, very boring books that are a mandatory read.”
ENGB1A
“Yes, you will have to work in this class.”
B1A

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, with , and low grades.

Main concern

Strict grading and .

What students said

“Most people in my class were failing with low F's and she had to assign 200 points of at the end.”
B1A
“She expects too much and she loves giving zeros for any minor mistakes.”
ENGB1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention test-heavy tags and many papers, but they do as proctoring, open-book, or closed-book format.

Test Heavy MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly ProvenPaper Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation, and do not clearly prove a .

Paper HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“very tough on grading papers which are a majority of grade”
ENGB1A

Online

Online reviews mention test-heavy tags and , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring policy.

Test Heavy MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ ”
B1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She expects too much and she loves giving zeros for any minor mistakes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Worst teacher by far I messed up changing the and she said she wasn't going to bother reading the rest and gave me 0/100 points.”

⚖️

12/100

“The , making it hard to determine if you're going to be successful.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“never answered emails gave so much work and expected top tier work didnt allow for any excuses”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • She expects too much and she loves giving zeros for any minor mistakes.
  • you.
  • did everything she asked for, even asked the kids who were passing her class with an A to check my work, it was even almost the same work but would still give me an F.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • Lots of sleep from boredom.
  • Yes, you will have to work in this class.

Theme 3

👍 Positive Minority

  • Professor Long is amazing.
  • .
  • if you follow along with her workload.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across several years show a consistent pattern of and heavy workload, with .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENGB1A10 reviews
B1A6 reviews
B17A1 review
ENG1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1