AI Rate Professor

Art History

Diego Gutierrez Monterrubio

ARTB36 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can self-manage deadlines and mainly want grade value, but if you need structured teaching.

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganized Online CourseEasy A PotentialHeavy Deadline ClusteringTextbook RelianceClear Criteria When Available
  • Online reviews repeatedly describe poor organization, weak communication, and .
  • Grades can be high with low effort, but workload often clusters near the end.
  • The , so format matters a lot.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Several online students earned A-range grades with minimal effort, but poor organization can still create deadline stress.

Easy A evidence comes mainly from online reviews, while the single .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content appears manageable and writing-based, but and .

Online reviews frame the course as easy but messy, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

Most online reviews , but one online review and the as mandatory.

Online attendance mostly appears flexible, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

, but repeated complaints about disorganization hold the recommendation down.

Online sentiment is mostly negative or hesitant, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students report , and that he is not a , though one student still earned a C.

Format shift

Lenient grading evidence comes from online reviews; the .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is not constant, but multiple reviews mention lots of , and many assignments due at once.

Format shift

Heavy workload complaints come from online reviews, while the .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Online students repeatedly say the course lacks teaching, organization, and timely .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is poor, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews emphasize assignments, essays, research paper, writing prompts, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews provide most assessment evidence, while the and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and calls the professor inspirational.

Main concern

Evidence is thin because there is .

What students said

“This professor embodies what a real professor should be.”
ArtB36

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe an easy grade path but weak organization, limited teaching, and .

Main concern

Students must track deadlines closely because modules, prompts, and due dates are reported as disorganized.

What students said

“Be VERY on top of due dates as the professor is incredibly disorganized, and I suspect doesn't .”
ArtB36
“If you want an easy A, this is the .”
ArtB36

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and finals, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Writing Prompt ExamsFinal AssignmentResearch Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Online reviews mention extensive writing prompts, a final, and a research paper, but .

Writing Prompt ExamsFinal AssignmentResearch Paper
“The , they are extensive writing prompts, so make sure to know your stuff and do it ahead of time.”
ArtB36
“The last two weeks he made every assignment due the same day, including a final and research paper.”
ArtB36

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an easy A, this is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“The material is interesting, but you're just relying on the textbook for information as he doesn't add anything to the class.”

📈 Grade Value

82/100

“On every single assignment, I got perfect marks, putting the most minimal effort into some of the assignments.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he doesn't teach in the lectures.
  • This professor embodies what a real professor should be.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • The last two weeks he made every assignment due the same day, including a final and research paper.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • If you want an easy A, this is the .
  • he is not a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews across 2024-2026 provide consistent online complaints, but .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ArtB366 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1