AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Isaac Vannasone

B65 · STATC1000E · B72 · B27 · MATHB1A · B70 · MATHB50 · B22 · B60 · MATHB70 · MATHB65 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
36.67%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of HomeworkTest HeavyLecture HeavyMandatory AttendanceHard to Understand
  • Student opinion is split, but many reviews describe and heavy self-teaching.
  • The class can reward disciplined , and use calculator methods.
  • Workload, tests, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earn A grades, but comments , and calculator mastery.

Online reviews make the A path look harder, while A or B grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students , and concepts that often require self-teaching.

Both formats describe the course as difficult, with online reviews especially stressing confusion and workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

as mandatory and warn that missing class causes lost points or major gaps.

Online , and in-person reviews repeatedly say skipping class hurts passing.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

37/100

The low recommendation rate matches many because and workload is heavy.

Online reviews are mostly negative, while in-person reviews are split but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Grades are possible, but and several students call him a .

Format shift

Both formats mention tests as a major grade driver, with and homework.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many students describe lots of , and frequent tests.

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Many students say he is nice and willing to help, but lectures are often hard to understand and rely heavily on slides.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews are broader and more divided.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly , and homework platforms.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, with as 50% of the grade.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative, with , and confusing lectures.

Main concern

Students often say they must teach themselves and keep up with a heavy workload.

What students said

“You're basically teaching yourself statistics with this guy.”
B22
“exams are 50% of your grade.”
B22
“Gives a TON of homework!!!”
MATHB50

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing heavy homework, tests, hard-to-understand lectures, and .

Main concern

Online students describe the class as stressful and difficult to follow.

What students said

“This class was very difficult for me.”
B22
“ .”
B22
“ .”
B72

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The study tools, but no clear proof of strict proctoring or open-book policy.

Four Tests And FinalTests HeavyCalculator Or Notecard AllowedPractice Tests Sometimes Match Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe multiple tests, finals, and a notecard were allowed.

Four Tests And FinalExams 50 PercentCalculator Or Notecard AllowedPractice Tests
“In total it was 4 tests and .”
B72
“exams are 50% of your grade.”
B22
“You are allowed calculators/a notecard for the exam”
B27

Online

Online reviews mention many tests and homework, but they do not clearly prove webcam proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Test Heavy
“there was a lot of tests and homework”
B22
“ grade.”
B22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You're basically teaching yourself statistics with this guy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“He only did lectures that were hard to understand.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Gives a TON of homework!!!”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

37/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He only teaches off of the PowerPoints, nothing else.
  • Lectures are strictly read from the PowerPoint slides.
  • He makes things more complicated than it has to be for statistics.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If .
  • If you complete all the .
  • !

Theme 3

🧮 About Workload And Tests

  • There is a lot of online HW and 4 tests
  • grade.
  • Homework and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six reviews across many years show , and uneven teaching quality.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 58
2 out of 54
1 out of 512

Course coverage

B2213 reviews
MATHB507 reviews
B603 reviews
B703 reviews
MATHB1A3 reviews
Show 6 more courses
B722 reviews
B271 review
B651 review
MATHB651 review
MATHB701 review
STAT-C1000E1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

8

C+ 3 · C 5

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1