AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Christina Lopez

JRNLB1 · COS126 · JRNL72026 · B1 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take Lopez if you like discussion-based journalism classes, but if strict attendance and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation RequiredLecture HeavyMixed Teaching QualitySlow GradingClear When Organized
  • Students split sharply between engaging lectures and poor organization.
  • Attendance and participation can strongly affect grades.
  • Grades are often good, but feedback and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many students earned A grades, but , and unclear timing mean the A is not effortless.

The easy-A evidence is almost entirely in person, while the single online review only reports an A without enough detail.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content is usually manageable, but , and shifting assignment dates add friction.

In-person comments describe the real workload and classroom issues, while online evidence is too limited to separate course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and several students say missing class can directly lower the grade.

In-person reviews repeatedly mention strict attendance, while the one as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend her when lectures feel relevant and organized, but because of and strict attendance.

The online review is positive, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades are often high, but students report , and large penalties for mistakes or absences.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide nearly all grading evidence, while the .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload ranges from manageable group projects , and tests.

Format shift

In-person reviews show uneven workload, while the single online review only says to get ready to read.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Some students call her enthusiastic and caring, while others describe poor organization, weak communication, and boring lectures.

Format shift

The online review is positive, but quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to mix tests, papers, group projects, participation, and .

Format shift

, and participation, while online evidence is too thin.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with praise for relevant discussions and criticism of , and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She and some werent even put in on time for grades to close.”
JRNLB1
“I wouldn't say this was an "easy A" course but it certainly was not difficult.”
B1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is positive but too thin to prove much beyond respect and .

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so online patterns are weak.

What students said

“Loved Mrs. Lopez, shes a down to earth teacher.”
COS126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but some students still found the tests difficult and test-heavy.

Open Book TestsOpen Note TestsTest HeavyAttendance Risk

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but comments conflict on whether that made exams easier.

Open Book TestsOpen Note TestsTest Heavy
“The class is an easy A because the .”
JRNLB1
“The but it only made things more difficult.”
JRNLB1

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor was great in the beginning but as the course went on things changed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Very enthusiastic, you can tell she loves what she teaches.”

⚖️

58/100

“ and marks off half your credit just for making a simple mistake.”

🚪

18/100

“If you miss a day she takes 15 percent of your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She likes to discuss current events a lot.
  • Her lectures aren't great and she pauses every few lines for .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Workload

  • The class is an easy A because the .
  • Only has assignments open for 6 hours.
  • She .

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • We never know when we are gonna get a assignment.
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across several years give enough detail, though opinions are polarized and one format has only one review.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

JRNLB112 reviews
B12 reviews
COS1261 review
JRNL720261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 9

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1