AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Michael Larson

ELETB5 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a knowledgeable engineering instructor who gives useful help, but treat the rating as limited evidence.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeableHelpful feedbackHands-on supportExtra lab timeTechnical depth
  • and describe him as knowledgeable and helpful.
  • The course is moderately difficult, with technical systems, boolean algebra, and ladder logic work.
  • Evidence is , so confidence is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Both reported grades are B, so success seems fair but not an automatic A and .

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material appears technical and moderately challenging, with , and ladder logic work.

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and one says it was mandatory, so the policy varies or .

and directly conflicts across the two reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

because he is knowledgeable, helpful, and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades shown are both B, with mentioned once, so .

Format shift

, so grading confidence is low.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The course involves reading, lab time, and ladder logic work, but there is not enough evidence to call it heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe him as knowledgeable, clear in technical execution, helpful with questions, and strong with feedback.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and both reviews are positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention , and lab diagrams, but exam weight is unclear.

Format shift

Only in-person assessment evidence exists and it is sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and willingness to help students through problems.

Main concern

The small , and .

What students said

“He showed lots of knowledge on the subject & was very good at helping when asked questions.”
ELETB5
“ and will work you through a problem if you can't wrap your head around it.”
ELETB5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the format.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and will work you through a problem if you can't wrap your head around it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting limited but consistent themes in technical teaching and feedback. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He showed lots of knowledge on the subject & was very good at helping when asked questions.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“If he taught Analog/Digital Electronics I would sign up in heartbeat.”

📘 Course Challenge

48/100

“ ladder logic diagrams done too.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He showed lots of knowledge on the subject & was very good at helping when asked questions.
  • and will work you through a problem if you can't wrap your head around it.

Theme 2

🔧 About Technical Learning

  • Knowledgeable, understands the systems, great execution on boolean algebra.
  • ladder logic diagrams done too.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, so the positive pattern is useful but not robust.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ELETB52 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values