AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Thomas Meih

CAL3 · MATHD · B6A · BABA · CALCU6A · MATHB23 · MATHB2 · MATHB50 · MATH1 · AMATH · B60 · MATHA · MATHBD · MATHB6C · MATHB60 · MATHB1B · B70 · B6B · MATHDD · MATHB6A · MATHB70 · MATHB1 · MATHBAANDBD · 77 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
63.16%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you will attend, use study guides, and can handle an old-school lecture style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but old-schoolTest-heavy gradingHelpful study guidesAccent can be hardUneven organization
  • Most students describe him as kind, helpful, and .
  • Grades often depend on tests and .
  • The main risks are fast lectures, accent, organization, and inconsistent communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic when students attend, study the reviews, and prepare for tests, but it is not automatic.

The online evidence is only one positive review, while test preparation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course content is manageable for many students, but fast pacing and assumed math background make it harder for weaker students.

Online evidence is too limited, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but many students say missing class makes passing much harder.

The online review says attendance was not mandatory, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students recommend him for his helpfulness and and communication.

The online review is positive but sparse, while but mostly favorable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

63/100

and sometimes forgiving, but several reviews .

Format shift

Online evidence is too limited, while but .

Workload

Light

76/100

, though some calculus reviews mention heavier work.

Format shift

Online evidence gives no workload detail, while .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

He is often described as patient and helpful, but some students find him disorganized, hard to understand, or poor at communication.

Format shift

The lone online review is very positive, while and recurring lecture issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades are mainly based on tests, quizzes, and a few .

Format shift

Online evidence does not define the , while and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, but and fast or .

Main concern

You may need to self-study when lectures feel fast or disorganized.

What students said

“Study guide matches the exams.”
MATHB1B
“Be ready to teach yourself because he makes this seem like its rocket science.”
MATHB1
“You should attend class because he covers a lot in one day.”
MATHB70

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive but too thin to generalize.

Main concern

Only one online review exists.

What students said

“Amazing professor! Very helpful and understanding”
MATHB60

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a , but exam difficulty varies by course.

Study Guides Match ExamsTest HeavyQuizzes And TestsFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

67/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes are central, with study guides often helping directly.

Study Guides Match ExamsTest HeavyQuizzes And Tests
“Study guide matches the exams.”
MATHB1B
“reviews packages .”
MATHB1
“ and quizzes.”
MATHB70

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book status, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Study guide matches the exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Awesome teacher. .”

📘

67/100

“Study guide matches the exams.”

⚖️ Workload Balance

76/100

“ so the only work we have is 4 exams that each reflect the study guide.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • it.
  • Sometimes he goes a little fast but if you ask him to explain it again he does with no problem.
  • He has a strong accent and that can get in the ways sometimes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • so the only work we have is 4 exams that each reflect the study guide.
  • so the and quizes but he usually grades fairly easy.
  • The questions on the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • Amazing professor! Very helpful and understanding
  • and sweet.
  • . He clarifies any doubts.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

77

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give strong evidence, although older reviews make some details less current.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 524
3 out of 57
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATHBD12 reviews
B604 reviews
MATHB14 reviews
B6B3 reviews
MATHB703 reviews
Show 18 more courses
B6A2 reviews
B702 reviews
BABA2 reviews
MATHB1B2 reviews
MATHB602 reviews
MATHD2 reviews
AMATH1 review
CAL31 review
CALCU6A1 review
MATH11 review
MATHA1 review
MATHB21 review
MATHB231 review
MATHB501 review
MATHB6A1 review
MATHB6C1 review
MATHBAANDBD1 review
MATHDD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2