AI Rate Professor

English

Allison Kimmel

Courses not reported · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can self-manage the work and tolerate a harsh classroom environment.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPassive aggressiveToxic learning environmentLots of homeworkUnclear gradingAttendance pressure
  • Every review gives the lowest teaching quality rating.
  • Students repeatedly describe passive aggressive behavior and a negative classroom tone.
  • Grades can be high, but students still report poor support and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Several students earned A or A+ grades and say the work can be easy with preparation, but and A.

, while the single online review earned a B and describes heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The work is not described as intellectually extreme, but reading, homework, tests, and .

Both formats suggest manageable content with poor delivery, though online evidence is only one review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory and one says missing class triggered passive aggressive treatment.

The online review says attendance was not mandatory, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against the course because the teaching style felt mean, passive aggressive, and unsupportive.

Both online and limited to one review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

High reported grades suggest A-level outcomes are possible, but students still mention tough or .

Format shift

, while online evidence is limited and less grade-friendly.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention lots of , and preparation, though one says the classwork is not absurd.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework or review.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

All reviews rate teaching quality as 1 and repeatedly describe mean or passive aggressive behavior.

Format shift

Both online and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests, so assessment appears mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both mention test-heavy tags, while and classwork concerns.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe passive aggressive , and some homework.

Main concern

Students report that her tone made the class unpleasant even when the work was manageable.

What students said

“She's just really mean.”
70224
“ but was often gone herself.”
70224

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review describes heavy reading, lots of , and a toxic learning environment.

Main concern

The main concern is disrespectful communication and passive aggressive comments.

What students said

“Her passive aggressiveness created a toxic learning environment”
70224

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention test-heavy work but do not clearly prove exam .

Test HeavyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyResearch Paper

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a research paper, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Test HeavyResearch PaperReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ ”
70224
“ unclear.”
70224

Online

The online review has a test-heavy tag but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Test HeavyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Get ready to read, Lots of ”
70224

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her passive aggressiveness created a toxic learning environment stating things like "wasting your time" when mistakes were made.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“She's just really mean.”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

5/100

“As a student, I expect a respectful place to grow and learn, and sadly, it lacked in this course.”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“The only positive is that work is easy with proper preparation and thorough review.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's just really mean.
  • Passive aggressive
  • She was extremely passive aggressive and would make comments in class about the tiniest mistakes.

Theme 2

📚 About Work And Grades

  • Lot of so mean sometimes.
  • The only positive is that work is easy with proper preparation and thorough review.
  • unclear.

Theme 3

🚫 About Student Experience

  • this teacher absolutely ruined the experience for me.
  • Her passive aggressiveness created a toxic learning environment

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews are consistent and recent enough to show a , but the total sample is small and online evidence has only one review.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

702245 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1