AI Rate Professor

History

Jonathan Malamma

HISTB17A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderHeavy workloadPoor explanationsMandatory attendance
  • Both reviews report very poor teaching quality and maximum difficulty.
  • Students , and weak lecture alignment with quizzes and exams.
  • The course appears high effort with low grade payoff.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A looks very unlikely because both reviews report tough grading, heavy difficulty, and .

Online evidence points to random grade-dropping work, while .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

The course feels difficult because students report , and maximum difficulty ratings.

Both online and in-person reviews describe high difficulty, but the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

0/100

.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students clearly discourage taking him because of , and frustrating course structure.

The online review says never take him again, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

, and low grades.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes random assignments and quizzes, while and .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The online review reports lots of homework and random assignments, while the .

Format shift

Online workload concerns are stronger; and lecture dependence.

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Both reviews give the lowest quality rating and .

Format shift

Online evidence attacks fairness and structure, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention assignments, quizzes, and exams, but the exact .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions assignments and quizzes, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The well and do not match quizzes and exams.

Main concern

Students may need to learn from books instead of lectures.

What students said

“He doesnt really explain things well and and exams.”
HISTB17A
“Youll learn more by reading the books than by listening to his lectures”
HISTB17A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports , and a sharp grade drop risk.

Main concern

Assignments and and grade-damaging.

What students said

“This professor is unwilling to be impartial and and quizzes.”
HISTB17A
“That .”
HISTB17A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and exams but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenQuizzesFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and but does not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring details.

Quizzes And ExamsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ and exams.”
HISTB17A

Online

The online review mentions quizzes but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ and quizzes”
HISTB17A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“He doesnt really explain things well and and exams.”

⚖️

5/100

“That .”

👎 Recommendation

0/100

“I would never take this professor again he should be fired.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesnt really explain things well and and exams.
  • Youll learn more by reading the books than by listening to his lectures

Theme 2

📉 About Grades And Work

  • This professor is unwilling to be impartial and and quizzes.
  • That .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, but both are consistent, detailed, and strongly negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HISTB17A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values