AI Rate Professor

Communication

Chris Holland

COMMB5 · COMMSMG · COMMB1 · COMMB804 · COMMB8 · COMM8 · COMB8 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
29.63%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you can handle strict participation, heavy communication work, and a very polarizing teaching style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderMandatory AttendanceHeavy WorkloadRude FeedbackPolarizing
  • Reviews are highly polarized, but negative experiences dominate the full record.
  • Many students describe rude , and heavy work.
  • Some students say she is knowledgeable and that hardworking students can learn a lot.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments often say the grade comes with , and heavy work.

Online evidence is negative and harsh, while but high emotional and workload cost.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is often described as common sense or manageable, but speeches, journals, group work, and .

Online comments describe poor support, while difficult classroom management.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

, and several tags say skipping class hurts passing.

Both online and expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend her because they describe rude communication, , and .

Online reviews are uniformly negative, while but remain mostly avoidant.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many reviews tag her as a and say mistakes, speeches, and participation are graded harshly.

Format shift

Both online and especially negative.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and busy work.

Format shift

Online reviews mention harsh online demands, while work.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A minority praise her knowledge, but , and weak feedback.

Format shift

Online reviews are strongly poor, while but still mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize speeches, , and participation more than exams.

Format shift

; online reviews do not clearly describe the full assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly , and rude class interactions.

Main concern

Many students say the class is stressful because expectations and .

What students said

“ ! !!”
COMMB1
“You have to work really hard to get a good grade and basically teach yourself.”
COMMB5
“Whether you like her or not, pass or fail, you will learn from her.”
COMMB1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are strongly negative, , and poor online-course support.

Main concern

Students describe the online version as harsh and poorly supported.

What students said

“A VERY RUDE TEACHER. .”
COMMB1
“Rude to students, seems unprepared to teach an online course”
COMMB1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or a .

Midterm MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the .

Midterm Mentioned
“She only gave us a 2 day notice for .”
COMMB1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I got an A in this class and finished the semester with a 4.0. Easy A but you'll be ripping your hair out every day.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“A communication teacher who sucks at communicating with her students.”

⚖️

28/100

“will dock a huge chunk of your grade for making mistakes”

👍 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is so knowledgeable.
  • She does not teach, expects you to be an expert speaker right off the bat
  • Difficult to understand her and what she is talking about.
  • do 4 speeches and they arent bad

Theme 2

📚

  • Lots of homework
  • She expects participation from the students, especially those who hope to get an easy "A".
  • You have to work really hard to get a good grade and basically teach yourself.
  • As long as you do the Journals, and perform professionally, class is really easy.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • In class, she is rude and personally disrespectful towards students.
  • Once you get to know her you will like her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-three reviews across many years and courses give rich, repeated evidence, though the tone is polarized and older reviews are common.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 521

Course coverage

COMMB119 reviews
COMMB812 reviews
COMMB55 reviews
COMB83 reviews
COMM82 reviews
Show 2 more courses
COMMB8041 review
COMMSMG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1