AI Rate Professor

English

Susan Pinza

ACDVB50 · ACDVB5A · ACDV7073 · ACDVB80 · ACDVB62 · ACDV62 · ENGB68 · ACDVB65 · ACDVB68 · ENGLB68 · ACDV50 · EDUCB7A · ACDV68 · ACDVB5 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take her only if , and attendance-based participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkEasy A with workStrict deadlinesCaring but demandingMixed teaching quality
  • Older reviews are very positive, but newer reviews are much more critical about workload and grading.
  • Many students say an A is achievable, but it requires , and meeting rules.
  • Her main risk is heavy work that can feel disproportionate to the course value.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is very possible, but students must complete many assignments, attend, participate, and .

Both online and , but online comments emphasize the workload more sharply.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The material is usually not hard, but the volume of , and participation makes it feel harder.

, while online reviews frame the course as unnecessarily difficult because of workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, and several comments say participation or showing up is required.

Online evidence is mixed on attendance, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends on tolerance for and because praise for caring teaching conflicts with strong workload complaints.

Online reviews are split, and in-person reviews range from highly positive older comments to strong recent criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Some students report and easy A paths, but , and strict late-work rules.

Format shift

Online reviews mention picky or clear grading, while and late-work penalties.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The , and assignments, even when the tasks are easy.

Format shift

Both formats describe heavy workload, with online reviews especially saying the workload is disproportionate.

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

She is often described as caring and helpful, but some students say she does not teach well and assigns unnecessary work.

Format shift

In-person reviews include many older strong positives, while online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear driven , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers and assignments, while and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

kindness and easy grades and newer complaints about excessive work and strict grading.

Main concern

Lots of , and strict rules can overwhelm students.

What students said

“its a lot of work and I do mean ALOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.”
ACDV50
“There's a lot of homework, but it's not too difficult.”
ACDVB5
“She grades super hard, gives ”
ACDVB80

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe a heavy workload with but uneven satisfaction.

Main concern

Online students complain that the workload feels excessive for the course value.

What students said

“There was just too much work for no reason.”
educb7a
“It was so much work & so more than 0.5 units.”
ACDVB5A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, and .

Assignments HeavyPapersMidterm MentionedFinal AssignmentsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final assignments in one class, but overall exam rules are not clearly proven.

Midterm MentionedFinal AssignmentsTests Not ManyAssignment Heavy
“Midterm and .”
ACDVB5
“Tests? Not many”
ACDVB80

Online

Online reviews mention papers and many assignments but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, Lockdown Browser, or .

PapersMany Assignments
“There was just too much work for no reason.”
educb7a
“It was so much work & so many assignments”
ACDVB5A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy "A" if you show up, do the work and get through the assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation conflict. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Warning

25/100

“There was just too much work for no reason.”

⚖️ Easy A With Rules

76/100

“Easy "A" if you show up, do the work and get through the assignments.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Professor Pinza is just about the , and helpful professor.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • There's a lot of homework, but it's not too difficult.
  • She and some work isnt necessary for her class.
  • its a lot of work and I do mean ALOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades And Rules

  • She grades super hard, gives
  • Late work is okay, but you will lose lots of points.
  • it's easy to get an A in her class, just do not be lazy! :)

Theme 3

❤️ About Teaching And Character

  • She takes her time to teach you.
  • , and you learn a lot in her class.
  • I don't recommend this professor at all, she grades hard, she gives

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

There are 29 reviews across a long time span, but the evidence is split by era and many older reviews are vague.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACDV507 reviews
ACDV684 reviews
ACDVB53 reviews
ACDVB683 reviews
ACDVB502 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ACDVB802 reviews
ACDV621 review
ACDV70731 review
ACDVB5A1 review
ACDVB621 review
ACDVB651 review
educb7a1 review
ENGB681 review
ENGLB681 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1