AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Carolyn Lane

CHDVB21 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take her only if you can handle a and possible grading frustration.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed teaching qualityMandatory attendanceHarsh grading concernUnorganized lecturesExtra credit
  • Student opinion and very negative.
  • Both reviews are in person and .
  • The biggest risk is organization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades were decent and is mentioned, but one student says grading is harsh even when following directions.

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course does not sound intellectually difficult, but and lecture issues can make it harder to manage.

, so this judgment applies to the in-person format only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student recommends her for being supportive, while another strongly advises choosing a different professor.

Recommendation evidence is only in person and is evenly split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

helps, but the strongest grading comment says her grading is harsh even when students do what she asks.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is not described as heavy, but and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

One review calls her a good and considerate teacher, while the , and time-wasting.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is only in person and strongly conflicting.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The comments emphasize assignments, group projects, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

support and one warning about organization, responsiveness, and harsh grading.

Main concern

and inconsistent teaching experience are the main risks.

What students said

“she is a good teacher and try's to work with you as much as she can”
CHDVB21
“She is unorganized, unresponsive to emails, wastes time in lecture”
CHDVB21

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam, proctoring, .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book rules, midterm format, final format, or quiz policy.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is unorganized, unresponsive to emails, wastes time in what she wants”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching consistency and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“she is a good teacher and try's to work with you as much as she can”

⚖️

35/100

“ what she wants”

👍 Recommendation Rate

50/100

“just go with a different professor who is more experienced”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She rambles on a lot during lecture and gets side track
  • She is unorganized, unresponsive to emails, wastes time in lecture

Theme 2

⚖️

  • try's to work with you as much as she can
  • what she wants

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are years apart with sharply conflicting opinions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHDVB212 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values