AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Daniel Cronquist

ENGRB47 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

, but do not treat attendance as optional.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEasy intro courseEngineering experienceGroup projectsCaringAttendance matters
  • Both reviews rate him perfectly and .
  • One review calls the class extremely easy, while the and rates difficulty higher.
  • Evidence is thin because there are only two in-person reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The class appears easy and includes , but the limited grade evidence and A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

One student calls it extremely easy, while another says the class is informative and tied to real engineering work.

Only in-person evidence exists, and the two reviews differ on difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and one tag directly warns that skipping class means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend him because , and brings useful civil engineering experience.

All recommendation , so confidence is limited.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and an easy-course comment suggest lenient grading, but there is too little grade .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

The course is described as easy and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and one older review gives more detail about assignments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students describe him as great, funny, caring, informative, and experienced in civil engineering.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews emphasize group projects and assignments designed to show engineering work, with .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as a great, caring professor with practical engineering experience and group projects.

Main concern

Skipping class may hurt performance.

What students said

“One of the easiest class ever.”
ENGRB47
“his experience as a Civil Engineer was critical to the main purpose of the class”
ENGRB47

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Cronquist is objectively a great professor- his experience as a Civil Engineer was critical to the main purpose of the class”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class structure. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Professor Cronquist is objectively a great professor- his experience as a Civil Engineer was critical to the main purpose of the class”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“his lectures were informative, he is funny and a joy to be around”

📌

18/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures were informative, he is funny and a joy to be around
  • his experience as a Civil Engineer was critical to the main purpose of the class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • One of the easiest class ever.

Theme 3

🧩 About Class Structure

  • Group projects
  • for all aspects of engineering work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and one is from 2019, so the positive pattern is promising but thin.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGRB472 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values